Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
Question about oddball denominations
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="yakpoo, post: 7752667, member: 18157"]I'm not an expert, but from what I've read, after the gold rush of 1849, the abundance of gold drove up the relative price of silver. Silver coins became worth more than their gold counterparts and quickly disappeared from circulation (<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gresham's_law" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gresham's_law" rel="nofollow">Gresham's Law</a>).</p><p><br /></p><p>To address this critical coin shortage, the Mint needed coins with a lesser silver content so they would stay in circulation. The first coin to address this need was the 3¢ "trime". It was so small and thin, it was popularly called a "fish scale". This denomination was chosen due to it convertibility to the 3¢ U.S. postage stamp.</p><p><br /></p><p>Later, in 1853, a new set of coins from 5¢ to 50¢ were designed with reduced silver content (about 7% less) to meet the needs of commerce. I just assumed that the 2¢ never caught on and didn't circulate. I'm not 100% sure why the 3¢ trime stopped being produced, but I suspect it's related the reduction in postal rates in 1883 along with a plentiful supply of alternative coins.</p><p><br /></p><p>I would recommend a book entitled "<b>History of the United States Mint and its Coinage</b>" (by David W. Lange) to anyone interested in the stories behind the coins. It's a page-turner![/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="yakpoo, post: 7752667, member: 18157"]I'm not an expert, but from what I've read, after the gold rush of 1849, the abundance of gold drove up the relative price of silver. Silver coins became worth more than their gold counterparts and quickly disappeared from circulation ([URL='https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gresham's_law']Gresham's Law[/URL]). To address this critical coin shortage, the Mint needed coins with a lesser silver content so they would stay in circulation. The first coin to address this need was the 3¢ "trime". It was so small and thin, it was popularly called a "fish scale". This denomination was chosen due to it convertibility to the 3¢ U.S. postage stamp. Later, in 1853, a new set of coins from 5¢ to 50¢ were designed with reduced silver content (about 7% less) to meet the needs of commerce. I just assumed that the 2¢ never caught on and didn't circulate. I'm not 100% sure why the 3¢ trime stopped being produced, but I suspect it's related the reduction in postal rates in 1883 along with a plentiful supply of alternative coins. I would recommend a book entitled "[B]History of the United States Mint and its Coinage[/B]" (by David W. Lange) to anyone interested in the stories behind the coins. It's a page-turner![/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
Question about oddball denominations
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...