Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Question about imagery of Annona and Providentia
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="John Anthony, post: 2471222, member: 42773"]Anyway, back to my post: as you've stated, the personification Providentia is frequently portrayed with a baton and globe, or at least holding a globe. It would be nice and clean if every reverse that had the inscription PROVIDENTIA showed a figure with baton and globe, but this is not the case. In fact, during the Severan dynasty, the inscription PROVIDENTIA is combined with the figure of Annona <b>more often</b> than with the figure of Providentia. </p><p><br /></p><p>This is not conversely true of coins with the reverse legend ANNONA, however. To my knowledge, the personification Providentia never appears on reverse types inscribed ANNONA. </p><p><br /></p><p>Therefore, I conclude that coins inscribed ANNONA refer specifically to the figure on the coin, whereas coins marked PROVIDENTIA refer to the figure on the coin when the figure is actually Providentia, but to the foresight of the emperor when the figure is Annona.</p><p><br /></p><p>As to how we categorize the reverse types, I think it's easiest to go by the inscriptions, so we can call coins Annona and Providentia types by their legends, regardless which personification appears on the Providentia types.</p><p><br /></p><p>Does any of that make sense? This is all off-the-cuff.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="John Anthony, post: 2471222, member: 42773"]Anyway, back to my post: as you've stated, the personification Providentia is frequently portrayed with a baton and globe, or at least holding a globe. It would be nice and clean if every reverse that had the inscription PROVIDENTIA showed a figure with baton and globe, but this is not the case. In fact, during the Severan dynasty, the inscription PROVIDENTIA is combined with the figure of Annona [B]more often[/B] than with the figure of Providentia. This is not conversely true of coins with the reverse legend ANNONA, however. To my knowledge, the personification Providentia never appears on reverse types inscribed ANNONA. Therefore, I conclude that coins inscribed ANNONA refer specifically to the figure on the coin, whereas coins marked PROVIDENTIA refer to the figure on the coin when the figure is actually Providentia, but to the foresight of the emperor when the figure is Annona. As to how we categorize the reverse types, I think it's easiest to go by the inscriptions, so we can call coins Annona and Providentia types by their legends, regardless which personification appears on the Providentia types. Does any of that make sense? This is all off-the-cuff.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Question about imagery of Annona and Providentia
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...