Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
Question about grading standards for Proof Morgans
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Bob Evancho, post: 5405582, member: 84595"]Hello Insider. This is an easy one to answer. If you take a Perfect Mint State 70 Silver Eagle and cut it perfectly in Half, you, now, no longer have a MINT STATE coin. You have a Post Mint Damaged coin which can Never be graded any grade. It is an altered coin and in this case it is an altered coin to look like a perfectly split planchet. I would put it in an ICG "For Educational Purposes" holder without grade to use to educate collectors on how a coin can be altered to look like a rare error. As an example, let us take an MS-63 1879 Indian Cent and skillfully alter it into an 1877 rarity. The die characteristics for an 1879 do not match the die characteristics for an 1877. ICG would encapsulate this coin without grade "For Educational Purposes". Although this example mentioned was an MS-63 1879, it is no longer gradable once it is PMDed and altered. I can see no logical reason why a TPG doesn't put a numerical grade on a problem Uncirculated or circulated coin. Unless they don't really know how to Details numerical grade by their standards. To use UNC Details without saying an MS Grade is like a weather man saying there is a 50/50 chance of snow. If it snows, he's right and if it doesn't snow, he's right. Now let me stand corrected, ICG is another TPG that gives a numerical DETAILS grade for details coins. I just checked some of my ICG Details coins.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Bob Evancho, post: 5405582, member: 84595"]Hello Insider. This is an easy one to answer. If you take a Perfect Mint State 70 Silver Eagle and cut it perfectly in Half, you, now, no longer have a MINT STATE coin. You have a Post Mint Damaged coin which can Never be graded any grade. It is an altered coin and in this case it is an altered coin to look like a perfectly split planchet. I would put it in an ICG "For Educational Purposes" holder without grade to use to educate collectors on how a coin can be altered to look like a rare error. As an example, let us take an MS-63 1879 Indian Cent and skillfully alter it into an 1877 rarity. The die characteristics for an 1879 do not match the die characteristics for an 1877. ICG would encapsulate this coin without grade "For Educational Purposes". Although this example mentioned was an MS-63 1879, it is no longer gradable once it is PMDed and altered. I can see no logical reason why a TPG doesn't put a numerical grade on a problem Uncirculated or circulated coin. Unless they don't really know how to Details numerical grade by their standards. To use UNC Details without saying an MS Grade is like a weather man saying there is a 50/50 chance of snow. If it snows, he's right and if it doesn't snow, he's right. Now let me stand corrected, ICG is another TPG that gives a numerical DETAILS grade for details coins. I just checked some of my ICG Details coins.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
Question about grading standards for Proof Morgans
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...