Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Insider, post: 5390949, member: 24314&quot;]DMPL_dingo, posted: &quot;My point is if this were a business strike it would no doubt get a details grade due to the cleaning. I don’t get why the standards are lowered or different for proofs. There is no consistency there.&nbsp; if a coin has been cleaned, harshly or lightly, it should receive a details grade. The strike type shouldn’t matter.&quot;</p><p><br /></p><p><i><span style="color: #b30000">What you are saying makes sense.</span>&nbsp; </i></p><p><i><br /></i></p><p><i>However, I think this is the answer to your question:&nbsp; </i></p><p><i><br /></i></p><p><i>Since Proofs are graded chiefly by spots and hairlines (which may not be considered as &quot;problems&quot; on proofs) that is probably the reason they are not detailed when those imperfections are present. <b> It would be like &quot;detailing&quot; an MS coin for bagmarks, weak strike, an low luster.</b></i>[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in