Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
Question About Discontinuing Silver Coinage
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="cladking, post: 128360, member: 68"]In early '66 they were making '64 silver and '65 clad. Cents and nickels would have all been '65. There were two date freezes in effect at this time; one was for silver which was expected to circulate with the clad indefinitely. The government thought that if the silver were discontinued it would be more likely to be hoarded, so it was continued. The '64 date freeze was legally superceeded by the coinage act of 1965 but there was nothing keeping them from continuing production. The '65 date freeze was not so much required by law as it was allowed by law. At the time the mint was intimating that it intended to make 1965 coinage indefinitely and without mintmarks. By around July of '66 they relented and started making 1966 coinage. By this time there was no more silver being produced. Curiously there are coins of the era which can be nailed down to their mint and year of manufacture. For instance there are some scarce silver quarters minted in Denver in 1965 using a clad reverse die. There are silver quarters dated 1965 but there origin isn't known with certainty. San Francisco used retired SMS dies to strike coinage for circulation through 1967. There is a clad quarter dated 1965 from Philly and made in '65. There are some rare 1965 clad quarters with Philly silver reverses but their year of manufacture is uncertain. There are numerous (~15) 1965 dated silver quarters made in 1965 (origin unknown). There are also several different transitional dimes and there have long been rumors of half dollars.</p><p><br /></p><p>It really gets complicated when you start looking at the SMS coinage. These were begun in 1965 but initially they experimented with 1964 dated coins. Experimentation continued and most of these coins were actually released in sets. There's a real hodge podge of metals, dies, and processes used during these years and most of the transitional pieces are quite scarce or rare now. This wasn't true thirty years ago because you could find the SMS coins in circulation and persistence would find some of the wrong reverse coins. These would be much more difficult now due to heavy wear and attrition.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="cladking, post: 128360, member: 68"]In early '66 they were making '64 silver and '65 clad. Cents and nickels would have all been '65. There were two date freezes in effect at this time; one was for silver which was expected to circulate with the clad indefinitely. The government thought that if the silver were discontinued it would be more likely to be hoarded, so it was continued. The '64 date freeze was legally superceeded by the coinage act of 1965 but there was nothing keeping them from continuing production. The '65 date freeze was not so much required by law as it was allowed by law. At the time the mint was intimating that it intended to make 1965 coinage indefinitely and without mintmarks. By around July of '66 they relented and started making 1966 coinage. By this time there was no more silver being produced. Curiously there are coins of the era which can be nailed down to their mint and year of manufacture. For instance there are some scarce silver quarters minted in Denver in 1965 using a clad reverse die. There are silver quarters dated 1965 but there origin isn't known with certainty. San Francisco used retired SMS dies to strike coinage for circulation through 1967. There is a clad quarter dated 1965 from Philly and made in '65. There are some rare 1965 clad quarters with Philly silver reverses but their year of manufacture is uncertain. There are numerous (~15) 1965 dated silver quarters made in 1965 (origin unknown). There are also several different transitional dimes and there have long been rumors of half dollars. It really gets complicated when you start looking at the SMS coinage. These were begun in 1965 but initially they experimented with 1964 dated coins. Experimentation continued and most of these coins were actually released in sets. There's a real hodge podge of metals, dies, and processes used during these years and most of the transitional pieces are quite scarce or rare now. This wasn't true thirty years ago because you could find the SMS coins in circulation and persistence would find some of the wrong reverse coins. These would be much more difficult now due to heavy wear and attrition.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
Question About Discontinuing Silver Coinage
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...