Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
Question About Artificial Toning
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="statequarterguy, post: 791892, member: 21782"]<font face="Times New Roman"><font size="3">Thanks all for the explanations. Makes since why I’ve even seen what I thought was AT in slabs. I also remember encountering many collectors that liked 20th century coins blast white and anything earlier toned. But Jim, when you say, these toned coins were around before the AT craze, are you saying they were around with such vivid colors or more subdued, as I remember? I do remember seeing some nice colorful toning on some real rarities, like an 1804 dollar, which was some of the most colorful toning I saw, but it was nothing compared to the intensity of what’s call natural today. Guess it would depend on what the coin came in contact with.</font></font></p><p><br /></p><p><font face="Times New Roman"><font size="3">As for what’s considered AT. I know from the basic chem. class I took, that I could speed up the toning or expose the coin to the right element and produce a desired color, much like what a coin is exposed to in an album or envelope. Would that be considered AT? At the opposite extreme, I can see where painting the coin with a stain would be artificial. But, what about the later example where one is simply helping nature?</font></font>[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="statequarterguy, post: 791892, member: 21782"][FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=3]Thanks all for the explanations. Makes since why I’ve even seen what I thought was AT in slabs. I also remember encountering many collectors that liked 20th century coins blast white and anything earlier toned. But Jim, when you say, these toned coins were around before the AT craze, are you saying they were around with such vivid colors or more subdued, as I remember? I do remember seeing some nice colorful toning on some real rarities, like an 1804 dollar, which was some of the most colorful toning I saw, but it was nothing compared to the intensity of what’s call natural today. Guess it would depend on what the coin came in contact with.[/SIZE][/FONT] [FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=3] [/SIZE][/FONT] [FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=3]As for what’s considered AT. I know from the basic chem. class I took, that I could speed up the toning or expose the coin to the right element and produce a desired color, much like what a coin is exposed to in an album or envelope. Would that be considered AT? At the opposite extreme, I can see where painting the coin with a stain would be artificial. But, what about the later example where one is simply helping nature?[/SIZE][/FONT][/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
Question About Artificial Toning
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...