Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Paper Money
>
Queen Elizabeth collections
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Notaphylic_C, post: 25895288, member: 130786"]Oops, I mucked up the order of nations again & forgot to post <b>Seychelles</b> (after Scotland). </p><p><br /></p><p>The <b>Seychelles </b>islands are one of those places where few notes were issued so we don't see them up for grabs very often. The little islands start off with a <b>QEII</b> profiled design in 1954 (much like Falkland Island initial series featuring HM QEII) such as <a href="https://en.numista.com/catalogue/note283457.html" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://en.numista.com/catalogue/note283457.html" rel="nofollow">this 5 Rupees</a>. But this early series has been much less popular than the 1968 2nd series which had a number of odd design elements that appeared controversial back then. </p><p><br /></p><p>I was hoping to pick up</p><p> an infamous <b>50 Rupees</b> <a href="https://en.numista.com/catalogue/note257928.html" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://en.numista.com/catalogue/note257928.html" rel="nofollow">"SEX note" (P-17) </a> but had to settle for this diminutive 5 <a href="https://en.numista.com/catalogue/note283458.html" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://en.numista.com/catalogue/note283458.html" rel="nofollow">Rupees (P-14)</a> which is far more common in higher grades:</p><p>[ATTACH=full]1649526[/ATTACH] </p><p>[ATTACH=full]1649525[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Notaphylic_C, post: 25895288, member: 130786"]Oops, I mucked up the order of nations again & forgot to post [B]Seychelles[/B] (after Scotland). The [B]Seychelles [/B]islands are one of those places where few notes were issued so we don't see them up for grabs very often. The little islands start off with a [B]QEII[/B] profiled design in 1954 (much like Falkland Island initial series featuring HM QEII) such as [URL='https://en.numista.com/catalogue/note283457.html']this 5 Rupees[/URL]. But this early series has been much less popular than the 1968 2nd series which had a number of odd design elements that appeared controversial back then. I was hoping to pick up an infamous [B]50 Rupees[/B] [URL='https://en.numista.com/catalogue/note257928.html']"SEX note" (P-17) [/URL] but had to settle for this diminutive 5 [URL='https://en.numista.com/catalogue/note283458.html']Rupees (P-14)[/URL] which is far more common in higher grades: [ATTACH=full]1649526[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]1649525[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Paper Money
>
Queen Elizabeth collections
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...