Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;DoK U Mint, post: 604247, member: 18848&quot;]I LOVE this question.</p><p>Pondered it and considered wherefores &amp; whys.</p><p><br /></p><p>Then considered ~</p><p>&quot;Do I want the worlds Biggest Baddest Bestest Diamond&quot; in the world....that COULD later be converted into many other Things for many others, thereby reducing it&#039;s inherent uniqueness, valued by the endowed fewest.</p><p><br /></p><p>Or the Bestest baddest single collectible that is equal to or greater in value to many lesser collectibles thereby &quot;worth&quot; more to the total of the many next enjoyers.</p><p><br /></p><p>Then decided that the only reason to have one worth many is so you can flip them to have many anyway. </p><p><br /></p><p>So I vote for having many to create a sequence sufficient enough to convert into one unique enough to transport far enough to use to acquire many again.</p><p><br /></p><p>Short version~It&#039;s all good! What comes around goes around.&nbsp;&nbsp; </p><p><br /></p><p>And the more the merrier.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in