Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;physics-fan3.14, post: 2499837, member: 19165&quot;]I really don&#039;t see any reason why it wouldn&#039;t be a 66. The luster, which doesn&#039;t show well in these pictures, may be the only reason - but I doubt it. In hand, or with better pictures, I may not even be surprised by a 67. </p><p><br /></p><p>I am confused about the date on this piece, however.... One side clearly says 1905. The other side, in smaller numbers (which I&#039;m assuming is the date) says 1906. But you, in your post, say 1907.... </p><p><br /></p><p>Furthermore, could you tell us about this coin? Why was it issued? What makes it special? Are these commonly found in high grade? How did you come across this coin? Tell us about the symbology of the coin (especially the hands and... tree?... on the reverse). My curiosity is insatiable.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in