Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;LEG END, post: 929511, member: 26139&quot;]<b>Audit trail.</b></p><p><br /></p><p>I made sure I kept rolls postmarked from Puerto Rico which I received b4 the actual mint release. Moreover, with those dies, die patterns can be matched to early releases in Puerto Rico and compared to Stateside. I just gotta add that I have not ever, never, and I do mean never happened before, pulled seven DIFFERENT die cracks in one roll. Also included- a doubled lobe. Got that tidbit? I have kept this stuff in reserve. I think the mint committed fraud calling their ceremony early release or first release, when rolls were on EBAY weeks before. Kind of irritated me, the sheer misspeak of their marketing and all. That&#039;s why I kept dated rolls from PR. And any good attributer could build a die pair profile of the PR releases, and that would produce it&#039;s own unique story about just how and why the Mint misled us on the 2010 releases.</p><p>I hope this answers your conjecture-filled questions.:smile[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in