Ptolemy I Tet - Real or Fake?

Discussion in 'Ancient Coins' started by frankjg, Jul 20, 2018.

  1. Nemo

    Nemo Well-Known Member

    Purchasing a coin with a 35 year old pedigree is absolutely no help against forgery. No offense, but that is terrible advice.
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Severus Alexander

    Severus Alexander find me at NumisForums

    Well, it is of significant value when it comes to Chinese coins, as long as there is some reason to think the pedigree hasn't been faked.
     
  4. Nemo

    Nemo Well-Known Member

    I know nothing about Chinese coins what-so-ever so I don’t doubt you’re right. However, the context of my comment was in regard to the Greek coin that started this thread. That “if it is indeed 35 years old, the chances of it being fake are slim.Would have been too hard to fool back then”
     
    Severus Alexander and TIF like this.
  5. Severus Alexander

    Severus Alexander find me at NumisForums

    Got it, you're right of course. I was just partially defending arashpour's comment when he said "specially the case for chinese cast coins." :angelic:
     
    Nemo likes this.
  6. Nemo

    Nemo Well-Known Member

  7. arashpour

    arashpour Well-Known Member

    I agree @Severus Alexander that pedigree could be faked too but in my specific case, I got these from CNG and they provided original board and tags and docs to prove it was from the mentioned collection in 1940s.
     
    Severus Alexander likes this.
  8. Bert Gedin

    Bert Gedin Well-Known Member

    From one who is not knowledgeable about Chinese coins, Real or Fake. I have a book, "Fakes & Forgeries" by Brian Innes. Chapter 1, "Funny Money" Covers some 30+ pages. This paragraph is selected - "How It's Done. Genuine coins are usually "struck" from molten metal under pressure between two engraved dies. Early forgers (and many more recent ones) did not have the technology for this. They made casts in terra-cotta or plaster from genuine coins in order to form their molten metal. As a result, counterfeit coins usually do not have such a sharp image, and their edges are less well defined." - Some of you may already know this. It is for the benefit of those who don't.
     
  9. arashpour

    arashpour Well-Known Member

    your comment are contradictory, in one comment you say that "Purchasing a coin with a 35 year old pedigree is absolutely no help against forgery" and in other you say "if it is indeed 35 years old, the chances of it being fake are slim" I am confused!
     
  10. Severus Alexander

    Severus Alexander find me at NumisForums

    "if it is indeed 35 years old..." was a quote from RomanGreekCoin3. Nemo was definitely not asserting this. :)
     
    Nemo likes this.
  11. RomanGreekCoin3

    RomanGreekCoin3 Active Member

    Yes, he was.

    After Alexander died abruptly, from either illness or possibly poisoned, he had no direct heir to his throne in his will,But Philip III( Alexanders half brother) was a puppet king under Alexanders generals, but that didnt last long, then Alexander IV ( Alexander the Greats son) took over, but then he was killed by Kassander,( one of Alexanders Generals) After that, the Generals carved up Alexanders empire.
    [​IMG]
    Ptolemy I founded the Ptolemaic Dynasty in Egypt. You might remember Cleopatra VII - ( of Battle of Actium/Mark Antony fame) She was the last Pharoah of Ptolemys Dynasty
     
    Petavius and Coinneseur like this.
  12. Bert Gedin

    Bert Gedin Well-Known Member

    Thanks for that, RomanGreekCoin3. But wasn't Caesarion, son of Cleopatra and, allegedly, Julius Caesar, Pharoah for a while ? If so, he would have been the last Pharoah of the Ptolemys Dynasty.
     
    RomanGreekCoin3 likes this.
  13. arashpour

    arashpour Well-Known Member

    well machinery improved since then. most old fakes are crude in style and easy to detect casts but pressed fakes made by hydraulic machine is hard to detect and that did not existed 50 years ago I guess.
     
    Petavius likes this.
  14. RomanGreekCoin3

    RomanGreekCoin3 Active Member

    Yes and no.

    I think Caesarian was Co- Pharoah with Cleopatra for a short while.- But it was kinda meaningless since Egypt was a vassal( client state) of the Roman Republic during this time. Mark Antony was getting seduced by Cleopatra so she and her Son can take over part of the Roman Republic after Mark Antony died

    After the Battle of Actium, Antony and Cleopatra committed suicide, Augustus killed Caesarian and thus became the new Pharoah of Egypt- turning the country into a true province of Rome.

    Right before this
    Caesarian was more of a puppet co ruler with his mom .( and she was kind of a puppet ruler for her husband Mark Antony)

    Caesarian was the last Pharoah( with that title) but he was too young to control anything really

    Lets just say Cleopatra was the last active ( defacto) leader of Egypt before it became a province of Rome. This is why she fought with Antony against Octavian and Agrippa during the Battle of Actium, and Caesarian had nothing to do with it. She was pulling the strings.

    Technically you are correct. Officially you are not

    Historians consider Cleopatra to be the true Pharoah at the time, even though she tried to pass the baton to her young son she had with Julius Caesar
     
    Petavius and Coinneseur like this.
  15. Bert Gedin

    Bert Gedin Well-Known Member

    I accept that not an active Pharoah, but, at least nominally, Caesarian was in "the Saddle", for a while, after his mother's questionable reason of death.
     
  16. Bert Gedin

    Bert Gedin Well-Known Member

    From "An Introduction to Coins and Medals" by Colin Narbeth. "Forgery was very common in Chinese history and the populace seemed to have not minded a great deal whether the coin was a counterfeit or not. Traders did their business with scales to check the weight anyway, and there is some evidence to suggest that at certain times counterfeit coins were more popular in that they were lighter to carry. Punishment for counterfeiting ranged from outright beheading to castration or having a hand cut off, but its deterrent effect did not prevent the forgers from producing their wares." - If going for Chinese holidays, and - whilst strolling along the Great Wall - considering a bit of coin forgery - Don't even think about it !!!
     
    arashpour likes this.
  17. RomanGreekCoin3

    RomanGreekCoin3 Active Member

    Well considering he was under 17 years old during the battle of Actium in 31BC... and most Pharoahs that young are being controlled by a regent, How much power could he really have had?
     
  18. Bert Gedin

    Bert Gedin Well-Known Member

    RomanGreekCoin3. Accepted that Caesarion was young and controlled by a regent, nevertheless, titularly, at least, he would have been in charge. Bearing in mind, his background was extremely powerful - his parents (allegedly) being Cleopatra VII and the Julius Caesar. Others may have exercised power on his behalf, but it would have been, potentially, very great power.
     
  19. Multatuli

    Multatuli Homo numismaticus

    Well, Carl Becker 200 years ago created fakes that still deceive a lot of people ...
    There are some paduans of about 400 years old, so well made that they are sold as sestertii by some sellers, and are bought by mistake by a lot of numismatists with reasonable experience. So I have to disagree with this opinion.
     
    Last edited: Jul 24, 2018
    Nemo and Andres2 like this.
  20. frankjg

    frankjg Well-Known Member

    He finally found the coin!!!!11!!!!

    It was in a 35mm film canister in his glove box (who still has film canisters?). He put it there when I asked him to take it to a jewelers to have it weighed.

    Trying to work out a trip to see them around FUN.
     
    TIF likes this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page