Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;rick, post: 106671, member: 1235&quot;]I think it would be impossible to really say where a current MS62 would fall until it was determined what grades covered what range of numbers. I think that a flat conversion of 62 to 88 would be a simple ration calculation that doesn&#039;t really solve anything except perception, and TPG&#039;s cash flow results. I know when I was a kid, if I got a 92 on a test, that was an A, but I don&#039;t think it&#039;s a stretch that people can work with a 70 base instead...</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Personally, I think a 100 point grading system would be great, if it were fixed, and not based on market grading.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>P 0-9</p><p>f 10-19</p><p>AG 20-29</p><p>G 30-39</p><p>VG 40-49</p><p>F 50-59</p><p>VF 60-69</p><p>EF 70-79</p><p>AU 80-89</p><p>MS 90-99</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>I had to exclude 100 in that example, because I included 0 in order to make it an even range. It actually works out fairly well, I think... And if it were fixed, and coins that are VF 63 would still be considered VF 63 fifty years from now, I think it&#039;s a welcome system.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in