Proper acetone procedure

Discussion in 'Coin Chat' started by DLeach, Oct 19, 2011.

  1. TheMont

    TheMont Well-Known Member

    I live in a rural area and our water is supplied by a water co-op. They do not soften the water and as a result I have to use a lime cleaner on our faucets, shower head, dishwasher, etc. on a regular basis. you'd be surprised how quickly the lime and calcium build up. For our humidifier and coffee maker I use distilled water and have no problem whatsoever. Every chemical leaves behind a residue, especially if you just let it evaporate. That's why I have, for many years, always rinsed off a coin, with distilled water, that I have used acetone to remove PVC residue. As I matter of fact I rinse coins that are dirty with distilled water and pat them dry with a soft cloth. I don't know how long you may leave your distilled water sitting in a plastic jug, but we use it so often, it doesn't have time to pick up any contaminants from the jug. As I said in an earlier post, I have never had a TPGS reject a coin that I've used acetone on it. Acetone DOES NOT react with any metal only what's on the metal, unlike dip which does react with the metal.

    Thanks for the kind comment on my 1964 PR69Cam Silver Kennedy, they are hard to get graded that high, no 1964 has ever graded a PR70. Now if I can just get one to grade PR69DCAM, I will have the Number 1 PCGS registry set for Proof silver Kennedy Half Dollars.

    By the way, I tried using acetone on an Eisenhower silver dollar, from the brown box, and it removed that haze that some of them develop.
     
    Kentucky likes this.
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    I readily acknowledged in my previous posts that there are more than a few coins in major TPG slabs that have foreign substances on them that were intentionally applied to them, for shall we say, nefarious purposes. In other words, to hopefully cause the coin to get a higher grade than it otherwise would have had that substance not been applied to the coin.

    But, in the vast majority of those cases I believe those coins were slabbed and cleanly graded because that foreign substance was undetected by the TPG at the time the coin was graded. In other words the TPGs were fooled by coin doctors. So personally, I find no fault with the TPGs regarding this. And in their defense, when something like this happens they back it up with their guarantee, most of the time anyway.

    That said, "could" those foreign substances have been detected by the TPGs ? Without a doubt, yes they could have. But only if the TPG had run the required testing procedures to do so. And THAT is the part that is not practical. So if that is what you are referring to, we are in agreement. Now you know why and I know why it is not practical, but I suspect many others don't. So ........

    The reason it is not practical is because of two things, the time element and the expense. If every coin were tested for foreign substances the turn around times for grading that most already find way too long would increase significantly, perhaps doubling or even tripling. And the cost for grading would also increase about the same I suspect. Those two things combined would pretty much put an end to the industry.


    edit - As for your comments about the "possible legal problem" with - you'd said conserving I'll saying cleaning but it's the same thing - all coins prior to grading; yeah I agree that would be a problem and not a good idea. However, if the owners of the coins agreed to it beforehand, then no problem would be involved. But that brings us right back to the reason it's not practical.

    I would also mention that there was a time, long ago, when NGC and PCGS actually tried that scenario of cleaning coins before grading. And this is documented -

    PCGS and NGC Dipping Coins

    The Professional Coin Grading Service and the Numismatic Guaranty Corporation have confirmed that they have been dipping coins upon request. The coins are not marked on the slab as cleaned.

    References: Numismatic News, 8 Aug 1995, p. 1; Coin World, 18 Sep 1995,
    p. 1, 7.
     
    Last edited: Feb 20, 2017
    Sardar and Paul M. like this.
  4. Insider

    Insider Talent on loan from...

    This does not count. The original idea as proposed was that all coins submitted would be "cleaned" if needed to remove foreign material or the cleaning would raise the eye-appeal and grade. This was rejected.

    "Upon Request" are the key words to the service the TPGS's performed. The two cases we are talking about are with permission or without permission.

    Interesting bit of history. I learned that in the 1970's ANACS needed to call a few customers requesting to remove the black crud on some "key" coins in order to tell if the mint mark was added. They also got into big trouble when they removed the LIQUID PVC (w/o calling the customer) that a 1936 Proof was covered with in the flip! The coin was sold in auction as having "beautiful sea-green toning." :facepalm: ANACS had to pay up.

    After that, a sentence was added to the submission form under the customer's signature line giving the authentication service permission to clean the coin if necessary for authentication - or something like that.

     
    Paul M. likes this.
  5. -jeffB

    -jeffB Greshams LEO Supporter

    Yeah, but even if the acetone's evaporating quickly enough to keep the coin cool, it's still cranking out free radicals by the ton in the combustion zone. I think you'd be nuts to try it with any valuable coin. (But now I've got something else to add to my experimentation to-do list...)
     
    Paul M. likes this.
  6. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    I'm well aware of that. I was merely pointing out another example of what you referred to as - an interesting bit of history.
     
  7. bdunnse

    bdunnse Who dat?

    http://www.nbcnews.com/mach/science/your-own-breath-could-make-needle-sticks-thing-past-n722681

    Make sure to tell the doc that you have bathed in acetone before you take the test.
     
    Paul M. likes this.
  8. iPen

    iPen Well-Known Member

    For the disposing of the acetone and xylene part, what if you simply left them outside to vent and evaporate? Is that bad for the environment? Assuming that no critters get to it and it's nowhere near anything flammable, my first thought would be it shouldn't be an issue... they evaporate inside the home all the time, so wouldn't evaporation outside be fine if not better?
     
  9. Kentucky

    Kentucky Well-Known Member

    Actually a pretty good question. The levels are so low, it is a kind of "who cares" issue, but it would add bad stuff to the atmosphere. If you burned them, it would just be adding more CO2. To answer the question though, I favor the outside evaporation.
     
    rlm's cents and Paul M. like this.
  10. -jeffB

    -jeffB Greshams LEO Supporter

    Yeah, the amount you evaporate won't amount to much, and it'll dissipate quickly -- as opposed to dumping it, where it could make a bigger mess over a small area.

    There's a good bit of acetone coming and going in the atmosphere due to natural processes. Here, as in other areas, I think acetone's less harmful than xylene, but neither one is an environmental atrocity.
     
  11. BadThad

    BadThad Calibrated for Lincolns

    The best and most responsible disposal tool is a hot, concrete surface with full sun. Just pour it out and POOF. It has to go somewhere -- and the air is much better than water or soil. It will dissipate and Mother Nature will take care of it.
     
    Kentucky and bdunnse like this.
  12. Dougmeister

    Dougmeister Well-Known Member

    Is acetone the correct solution (no pun intended) for proof coins with haze and/or light fingerprints?

    (I understand that, if the fingerprints have been there long enough, they are not going away regardless of how long I soak it)
     
  13. TheMont

    TheMont Well-Known Member

    I used acetone on a Eisenhower Dollar that , in the brown box holder, had become hazy. It took off the haze and the coin looked really good. I don't know about fingerprints, but it can't hurt to try. Remember, acetone doesn't effect metal.
     
    Dougmeister and Paul M. like this.
  14. Paul M.

    Paul M. Well-Known Member

    It probably won't do anything for the fingerprints, but it won't hurt, either.
     
    Dougmeister likes this.
  15. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    Yeah it'll remove fresh fingerprints. As for the haze, it depends on what's causing the haze - or what any given person is calling haze anyway. I say that because haze is the beginning stage of toning, and no acetone will not remove that. But if what you're calling haze is a surface contaminant, then yeah in some cases it will remove it. In others it won't, and you'll have to move up to xylene. And if that doesn't do it, because it won't remove toning either, then your only choice is coin dip.

    It works like this, I use the word "hotter" to describe the different steps of progression. 1st is distilled water, it's not hot at all. 2nd is acetone, it's hotter than water. 3rd is xylene, it's hotter than acetone. And 4th is coin dip, it's hotter than all 3 of the others.
     
    Paul M., Kentucky and Dougmeister like this.
  16. Dougmeister

    Dougmeister Well-Known Member

    Thanks. And where would I buy xylene if the acetone doesn't work?
     
  17. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    Any paint store will have it.
     
  18. iPen

    iPen Well-Known Member

    I got mine at Home Depot.
     
  19. iPen

    iPen Well-Known Member

    Is it really beneficial at all to start with distilled water, in theory or in practice?

    I've been simply starting with acetone.
     
    Paul M. likes this.
  20. Insider

    Insider Talent on loan from...

    IMO, you can skip the water. You can skip the acetone also; however, since it cannot hurt the coin and will remove organic stuff on it, it cannot hurt so let's leave that step in. You see, Doug is correct to work in steps. The more contamination and oxidation you can remove before going to the next step the better. Most just dip the coin in one step. Although this usually works, on occasion there will be something on the coin that reacts with the dip and the result is not as good (including blow-ups) as it would have been doing the steps.

    Even Care and I suspect Verdi-Care will remove many types of haze or contamination such as PVC. Many professionals swear by MS-70 as straight dip tends to turn the edges of exposed copper under the clad layer pink. My step #1 is MS-70 and very often that alone does the job. ;)
     
    Paul M. likes this.
  21. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    Except that using MS70 on copper usually turns the copper blue or purple. And when it does, the coins are often rejected by the TPGs as AT.

    Follow the steps, for even distilled water will remove some things that acetone or xylene will not, or at the least will not do the job as well as the water.
     
    Paul M. and JMGallego like this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page