Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Kirkuleez, post: 2319173, member: 36864&quot;]I love that &#039;62 and remember debating about its method of manufacture a while back. I forget what I called it then, but I would call it a proof today if I were asked. The only thing holding me back is the incomplete luster within the devices of the reverse C. They aren&#039;t always completely frosted on proofs, but I&#039;ve never seen a PL business strike with complete frost. If I ever see this area frosted, I can say very little question that it is a proof strike.&nbsp; I think that you have a small error in your post though. Assuming that this is a MS-65, a proof of the same grade would be far more valuable than a normal business strike (though a nice PL example like this would certainly fetch a premium). Did NGC give it the PL designation?[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in