Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Proof collectors (not just sets); anyone here do this these days or why not?
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="KTO, post: 1436142, member: 37914"]Among modern proofs, I find the Franklin Half Dollar series interesting because you can find proofs of the same date with an overall mirror finish and other proofs with a cameo finish. Apparently, training and production standards were not uniformly followed at the mint in the 1950's, so while some dies were polished only the background areas of the die giving the proof coin a "frosty" cameo, other operators polished the entire die prior to press work, which gives the mirror finish to both the background and design elements. To be fair to any former Mint employees, there was great demand for the more time-consuming proofs at the time and the Mint was probably understaffed to handle it.</p><p><br /></p><p>As regards the cameo proof strikes, since the Franklin is such a large coin it is also easier to distinguish on observation a deep cameo design (graded DCAM Proof) that would have resulted from an early strike of a proof die before the edges of the design became slightly worn and produced a regular cameo appearance (graded CAM Proof) or less. For many modern proofs, the CAM distinction is irrelevant because all the proofs have a cameo appearance, but it does have more significance with the Franklin proofs.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="KTO, post: 1436142, member: 37914"]Among modern proofs, I find the Franklin Half Dollar series interesting because you can find proofs of the same date with an overall mirror finish and other proofs with a cameo finish. Apparently, training and production standards were not uniformly followed at the mint in the 1950's, so while some dies were polished only the background areas of the die giving the proof coin a "frosty" cameo, other operators polished the entire die prior to press work, which gives the mirror finish to both the background and design elements. To be fair to any former Mint employees, there was great demand for the more time-consuming proofs at the time and the Mint was probably understaffed to handle it. As regards the cameo proof strikes, since the Franklin is such a large coin it is also easier to distinguish on observation a deep cameo design (graded DCAM Proof) that would have resulted from an early strike of a proof die before the edges of the design became slightly worn and produced a regular cameo appearance (graded CAM Proof) or less. For many modern proofs, the CAM distinction is irrelevant because all the proofs have a cameo appearance, but it does have more significance with the Franklin proofs.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Proof collectors (not just sets); anyone here do this these days or why not?
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...