Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;19Lyds, post: 1920951, member: 15929&quot;]&quot;And couple what I have seen myself with thousands of other reports&quot;</p><p><br /></p><p>Thousands?</p><p><br /></p><p>As for your point(s)? I prefer to &quot;understand&quot; the possibilities since in my years of looking at (specifically) the 1956 - 1964 Proof Sets, I rarely encountered one that had not been &quot;torn&quot; open. And this was way before eBay and the paranoia which surrounds sellers on that venue or the availability of reproduction envelopes.</p><p><br /></p><p>Have I seen &quot;unsealed&quot; sets? Yes</p><p>Have I seen &quot;sealed&quot; sets? Yes</p><p>Have I seen evidence of &quot;sealed&quot; sets where the envelope was &quot;torn open&quot;? Yes</p><p><br /></p><p>I am not questioning your &quot;belief&quot; in probabilities Doug. I am simply adding another level of understanding in the possibilities based upon my own personal observation.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in