Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;maridvnvm, post: 26188147, member: 31620&quot;]None of the references seem to make any differentiation on these attributes on the attribution. As such I think it would be RIC 360 Bust type F with a note about the aegis. That is one of the many, many problems with RIC for these issues. It is more difficult to find a plain Bust type F from Ticinum at this time than one with attribues. The majority have drapery (paludamentum folds) on the far shoulder.</p><p><br /></p><p>The second coin on this page is close to your bust </p><p><a href="https://probvs.net/probvs/R365/R365.html" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://probvs.net/probvs/R365/R365.html" rel="nofollow">https://probvs.net/probvs/R365/R365.html</a></p><p><br /></p><p>There are others.</p><p><br /></p><p><a href="https://probvs.net/probvs/R428/R428.html" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://probvs.net/probvs/R428/R428.html" rel="nofollow">https://probvs.net/probvs/R428/R428.html</a></p><p><a href="https://probvs.net/probvs/R436/R436.html" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://probvs.net/probvs/R436/R436.html" rel="nofollow">https://probvs.net/probvs/R436/R436.html</a></p><p><br /></p><p>I am not saying that it isn&#039;t interesting but I don&#039;t think it changes the attribution.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in