Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Porsche2007, post: 1348475, member: 3757&quot;](Clarification: writing a little bit, is my desire when ratiocinating something like this contest. As consequence, I will not participate for the grand prize.)</p><p style="text-align: center">[ATTACH]156096.vB[/ATTACH]</p><p>The introduction, and subsequent dispersion, of the Kennedy halves appeared to be improper and disrespectful. Nonetheless, the antepenultimate and ultimate words never remove proper credit from the side of Roberts (obverse) and Gasparro (reverse). The coin is a dulcet, exquisite creation that was originally composed of 90% silver. During 1965 through 1970, the silver content was at 40%; in the majority of the pieces struck after 1970, there is no silver.</p><p>With a diameter of 1.205 inches, no person suffering from something like essential tremors should have sufficient angle to criticize the piece. However, minorities are often ignored in the United States; consequently, one had greater chance of encountering the coin in a casino than in public street. During recent years, though, various casinos commenced to diminish their acceptance of halves.</p><p>The Secretary of the Treasury can supplant a coin&#039;s design, once in 25 years of the last adoption. The inconvenience was that the Franklin half dollar had not yet celebrated its quarter of a century. Consequently, Enrique Barbosa González (1916-05-03) introduced a bill in Congress that would permit the representation of Kennedy on the half dollar. After president Johnson&#039;s favorable pressure, the bill was authorized during December of 1963.</p><p>As with all series, someone from &quot;above&quot; first thought about how to make some additional profit with this particular introduction. Well, in part, an additional profit could be acknowledged as part of a tactical reflection to maintain the series alive. (Simply because the anterior words are licit, other possibilities shouldn&#039;t be sepulchered.) Various errors (Clip<strike>, Cracked Planchet, Struck Thru Grease, etc.) and die varieties (DDO, DDR, Accent Hair, No &quot;FG&quot;, Invert S, etc.) are present within the series.</strike></p><p><strike>As customary, the U. S. Mint had the intention to create a &quot;business within a business&quot;. Eva Bertrand Adams (1908-09-10) was brought in to be utilized, partially, as a tactical front against individuals that would be disposed to deviate themselves towards a fable. For example, Adams never washed her hands when she accused other people for the mild turbulence near her epoch as director. The anterior maneuver, while tactical, was quite insignificant. The following supposition derives from a same base that appropriately supported her words:</strike></p><p><strike>1. any information that one might necessitate to near, would always be projected towards &quot;x&quot; control tower.</strike></p><p><strike>1a. in certain occasion, one may need to propagate a content that could be unknown for the regulators and interceptors of the information. The only interest would be that the receivers should rapidly comprehend the acquired data.</strike></p><p><strike>1aa. to break against one&#039;s consistency could equal a lack of respect, something protocolar, and/or a &quot;waste of time&quot;; though, with the ultimate possibility, a separation of a tactic could certainly be distinguished.</strike></p><p><strike>1ab. one opted to maintain the consistency and to propagate something with a lie in between. Therefore, the regulators analyze the somewhat-unknown information and accept it in intact state. Thanks to this connection (interruption for a brief advertisement: take control of your collection--thecoinnection.com) between giver and receiver, the maneuvers can continue in a decorous manner. It would be irrelevant if someone, later, would recognize the inconvenience between what was projected.</strike></p><p><strike>1ac. one should remember that the essence is in recognizing the degree of compatibility that could be maintained between &quot;an incorrect variable&quot; and &quot;an original variable&quot;. If there isn&#039;t sufficient comprehension between the variables, then the lie isn&#039;t valid for certain equation.</strike></p><p><strike>1b. in certain occasion: upon something fragmented (already registered) within part of one&#039;s mentality, certain memories would unite themselves to interlace what is fragmented and to culminate with something new. In direct relation with something stored in conjunction with a &quot;modification,&quot; a beneficial break propagates itself: at the moment of refloating the confection, the accommodated information is altered with probable settlement in certain memory and finalized with something unaltered or &quot;altered&quot;.</strike></p><p><strike>1ba. this is something that isn&#039;t used to wash one&#039;s hand(s). The tremendous naturalness in the point &quot;1b,&quot; adequately checks (thirteenth sense of the word) various displacements that could be directing themselves towards something unnatural.</strike></p><p><strike>1c. in the majority of the occasions, a giver comprehends that one shouldn&#039;t lock upon something based in the naturalness that finalizes pushing upon natural limits. Example: in numerous cases, a human could arrive to machinate a formula (from certain position, in certain position, of certain form, towards certain memory, etcetera) without understanding, from that equation, what it could arrive to signify with possible relation to something.</strike></p><p><strike>1ca. this is something that runs in parallelism with the point &quot;1ab&quot;; regardless, clearly, this shouldn&#039;t be considered a lack of respect.</strike></p><p><strike>1d. in certain occasion, a cover in triple sense would be something valid.</strike></p><p><strike>About three decades in posteriority to the first Kennedy halves, the 1964 50C SMS pieces were publicly declared. Currently, the special coin represents the mold of the series. Furthermore, it seems simple to believe that the pieces were the bonus of some people that were amalgamated with their divulgence and creation.</strike></p><p style="text-align: center"><strike>[ATTACH]156095.vB[/ATTACH]</p><p>[HR][/HR]</strike></p><p><strike>I don&#039;t admire writing about something, like Kennedy halves, that was already publicly specified in a phenomenal manner. Therefore, in order to tranquilize myself, the &quot;supposition&quot; was included as my original contribution.</strike></p><p><strike><br /></strike></p><p><strike><br /></strike></p><p><strike>Salutations.</strike></p><p><strike><br /></strike></p><p><strike>Postscript: there are various reasons for my &quot;brief advertisement&quot;; however, I&#039;ll only specify one [reason]. My exposition appropriates itself more rating, if any of the following were to succeed: the words remain intact or the words are edited out.</strike>[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in