Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Kirkuleez, post: 3061195, member: 36864&quot;]I was aware of the J-1988 Farouk/Kasoff/Cline pattern, but are all 1916s patterns, or generally just considered type I?&nbsp; I became very interested in the R-8 PR-50 pattern because it is the only SLQ that is a proof that has not been debated (though it is a pattern and not a regular issue). There are other 1917 type I that are speculated to be matte proofs, though there are no mint records of their manufacturer. Because no mint records exist for proof mintage for the series, and since the few that have been considered proofs over the years have always been somewhat controversial, no TPG will ever certify one as such.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in