Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;mrbrklyn, post: 446085, member: 4381&quot;]No, they really haven&#039;t.&nbsp; What has been posted is frankly garbage for standard and would never make it out of the board room of a business serious about quality.&nbsp; And it isn&#039;t even what they use in the real world, as you can see by idiotic juxtapositions of messages that say you can&#039;t grade by photo&#039;s but then get annoyed when pointing out flaws in enlarged images because the proposed magnification is too high.</p><p><br /></p><p>Does the nick on the rim so small that you can&#039;t see it with a x5 loop enough to kill a 70 or not?&nbsp; Who the heck knows.&nbsp; Must people seem to think it is.</p><p><br /></p><p>Is a clear good strike good enough for a 70?&nbsp; Maybe not if the strike as a wave that you can see at a 70 degree angle.&nbsp; Or maybe so?&nbsp; Is it adressed?&nbsp; Is there a book listing the thousands of possible events?&nbsp; Who knows?&nbsp; </p><p><br /></p><p>Its a non-validated process...</p><p>Its junk.&nbsp; </p><p><br /></p><p>Ruben[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in