Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Juan Blanco, post: 1598094, member: 41665&quot;]I just looked at a few other examples; some are jokey/potty humor, others &#039;artistic.&#039; So I wonder what percentage are frankly pornographic? </p><p><br /></p><p>Based on wear, the chamber-pot is also not the central focus in this much-abused coin:</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH]224166.vB[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>This example is ambiguous: clearly artistic but also lovely. From the 1940s? </p><p>[ATTACH]224167.vB[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Please define &quot;better quality.&quot;&nbsp; The example above is a more aesthetically pleasing, but unclear design.&nbsp; </p><p><br /></p><p>I prefer <i>clarity </i>- detecto&#039;s stark example has a very explicit purpose, I believe.&nbsp; (Roman <i>spintriae</i> took this to Nth degree.)[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in