Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;kanga, post: 787131, member: 9270&quot;]Since mintmarks were no longer &quot;hand&quot; punched in 1999 but place directly on the production hub, in theory this should not be an RPM (<b>R</b>e<b>p</b>unched <b>M</b>intmark).</p><p>So that should leave only strike (or mechanical) doubling.</p><p>BUT if that is the source of the doubling then it should show on other areas of the coin like the date.</p><p>I don&#039;t see that.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>The only other thing I can think of is post-mint damage.</p><p>Automated coin wrapping machines often &quot;push&quot; design elements on coins around creating apparent doubling.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>I&#039;ve pretty much run out my string.</p><p>Now we have to wait for the big guns to chime in.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in