Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;gsimonel, post: 2948327, member: 82549&quot;]I just read the thread that Smojo linked to above. Apparently the modern thinking is that Trier was the main mint for most of his coins:</p><p><br /></p><p><a href="http://www.forumancientcoins.com/lateromancoinage/gallic/postumus.html" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://www.forumancientcoins.com/lateromancoinage/gallic/postumus.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.forumancientcoins.com/lateromancoinage/gallic/postumus.html</a></p><p><br /></p><p>Also, at least according to this site, all the Moneta reverses were from the same issue and same officina, which leaves me even more confused, since there is such a great difference between obverse portraits. </p><p><br /></p><p>(BTW, while proofreading this before posting it, I discovered that if you Spoonerize &quot;obverse portraits&quot; it becomes &quot;perverse orbtraits.&quot;)[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in