Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Lehigh96, post: 7829504, member: 15309&quot;]I don&#039;t think it matters.&nbsp; Here is an MS67 that I found in an old fatty holder with near terminal rim toning on both sides, complimented by stunning lustrous rainbow toning on the remainder of the surfaces.</p><p><br /></p><p><img src="https://i.imgur.com/xcFLSJY.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p><img src="https://i.imgur.com/C4nJvAG.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p>Now it is certainly possible that the rim toning didn&#039;t exist when the coin was encapsulated and the coin turned in the holder.&nbsp; But if that was the case, why would NGC upgrade the coin from MS67 to MS67 5FS when I submitted the coin for designation review? </p><p><br /></p><p><img src="https://i.imgur.com/8t9CF7M.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p>It seems more logical me that NGC simply doesn&#039;t find deep rim toning detrimental to the overall grade in the way that most collectors think it should.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in