Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;SuperDave, post: 2618770, member: 1892&quot;]I would guess the coin was judged &quot;market-acceptable&quot; as an EF40, the irregularities being attributed to &quot;normal&quot; circulation exposures to the environment. It might have been a kindness, because a normal XF 1921-S (not a Thornhead) is not of sufficient value to slab. Keep in mind, although the 1921-S is not the most common of the 1921&#039;s, its&#039; mintage still <b>greatly</b> exceeds that of any previous Morgan except 1889-P (and the difference there is only 31,000 coins) and it was not subject to Pittman Act melting. They&#039;re not exactly uncommon except in the highest of grades (I believe there is one single MS67 in an NGC slab).[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in