Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Morgandude11, post: 2551433, member: 37839&quot;]Yes, it is close, but no cigar for PL.&nbsp; I agree, solid in grade, with the + very viable.&nbsp; The extreme brightness and contrast of the coin made it very hard to photograph, as&nbsp; SuperDave suggested above.&nbsp; Morgans are big to begin with.&nbsp; Getting a good light on it tends to accentuate contrast--the blacks look really cameo, even if they aren&#039;t. The frost can come off as strike issues, when they aren&#039;t there.&nbsp; So, I agree--a hard coin to photograph.&nbsp; Had it been older, it probably would have made the grade for PL, but it is definitely borderline NOT prooflike by today&#039;s tougher standards.&nbsp; In my experiences, NGC is very tough on PL designations today--sometimes, given the individual grader, tougher than PCGS at times.</p><p><br /></p><p>Your coin is beautiful, Cascade.&nbsp;&nbsp; Great combination of a crystal clear, almost mark free obverse with that champagne tone on the reverse makes for a totally stunning coin.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in