Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;RonSanderson, post: 26433458, member: 77413&quot;]I keep coming back to the 24-D. I can hardly imagine a grade MS64BN that does less to capture the nature of a coin. When I look at that essentially perfect obverse I can’t imagine what they were thinking. True, I can find a bit of corrosion under the reverse toning; maybe that is more widespread than revealed in the photo.</p><p><br /></p><p>The 22-D is a marvel. Virtually every 1922 that is shown apparently came from overused and worn-out dies. Again, I am baffled about what holds this from a MS66. What did they see?</p><p><br /></p><p>In both cases, if these were compared against the finest-known, are there demonstrable flaws, or is it just because some folks like mint red and others like toning?[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in