Post your Lincolns!

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by New Gen. Nick, Oct 4, 2011.

?

Do you like the new pennies?

  1. OH YEAH BABY.

    31.9%
  2. ew no.

    68.1%
  1. dwhiz

    dwhiz Collector Supporter

    Found this in my change today.
    1961 1c 1-horz.jpg
     
    Bambam8778, Dynoking, wxcoin and 7 others like this.
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. RonSanderson

    RonSanderson Supporter! Supporter

    1988-S proof
    01c 1988-S PF #02 full 01v.gif
     
    BadThad, robec, dwhiz and 1 other person like this.
  4. 1916D10C

    1916D10C Key Date Mercs are Life! 1916-D/1921-D/1921

    Those are flow lines??? I thought flow lines radiated out from the center of the coin.....
     
    Pickin and Grinin likes this.
  5. RonSanderson

    RonSanderson Supporter! Supporter

    I asked that back in August but still remain ignorant. Although I did some calculations and eliminated quantum tunneling! But really, why is it rippled?
     
    Last edited: Oct 9, 2018
  6. rmpsrpms

    rmpsrpms Lincoln Maniac

    Here's a new 43-D DDO that I need to send in for listing. Shows up strong on LIBERTY. Shot with my new Stack and Stitch system. Try zooming-in all the way, it stays sharp from full coin all the way to fine details...

    https://easyzoom.com/image/125250
     
  7. mas4492

    mas4492 Junior Member

    "Here's a new 43-D DDO that I need to send in for listing."

    Magnificent photography.
     
  8. Pickin and Grinin

    Pickin and Grinin Well-Known Member

    Those aren't flow lines they have to do with the plating process. Possibly minor linear plating blisters or the way the planchets are prepared before plating.
     
    orifdoc and 1916D10C like this.
  9. 1916D10C

    1916D10C Key Date Mercs are Life! 1916-D/1921-D/1921

    Thanks for clearing this up. I thought I had been misinformed for years about the appearance of flow lines.
     
  10. dwhiz

    dwhiz Collector Supporter

    This just rolled in. I'm replacing a AU 58 details 1984 DDO PCGS 1-horz.jpg
     
    BadThad, robec, Dynoking and 4 others like this.
  11. coinsareus10

    coinsareus10 Well-Known Member

    Nice replacement, that's a beauty.
     
    dwhiz likes this.
  12. Dynoking

    Dynoking Well-Known Member

    Nice find! Condition aside am I correct to call this a partial out of collar strike? The obverse rim from 2-5 o'clock and 10-12 o'clock add character. It may not be a major error but certainly a cool keeper in my book. And the cost? Priceless!
    Happy hunting!
     
  13. robec

    robec Junior Member

  14. rmpsrpms

    rmpsrpms Lincoln Maniac

  15. CircCam

    CircCam Victory

    Wow.
     
    DBDc80 and robec like this.
  16. dwhiz

    dwhiz Collector Supporter

    I'll second that.
     
    CircCam and robec like this.
  17. RonSanderson

    RonSanderson Supporter! Supporter

    And here's why I don't know how to grade. This looks absolutely perfect except a typically weak O on the reverse. If it had been MS65, MS66, or even MS67 it would have been easier to understand than MS64. Why not 68, really?

    Good thing I collect raw coins - they are what they are. Not that they are anything like this, of course.
     
    robec and dwhiz like this.
  18. Cheech9712

    Cheech9712 Every thing is a guess

    dwhiz likes this.
  19. Cheech9712

    Cheech9712 Every thing is a guess

    No steps
     
  20. RonSanderson

    RonSanderson Supporter! Supporter

    If you look real closely at the 1987, there are steps but they are weak and indistinct. The steps come back in 1988. It’s as though the mint needed five years to figure out making the Zincoln proofs.
     
  21. BadThad

    BadThad Calibrated for Lincolns

    I think I just pee'd a little. WOW!
     
    robec likes this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page