Next up is 1937. I bought the first coin as an upgrade because of the spottiness on the second one. (Lincoln with measles?) I put the first one face up and the second one face down - why just show the fronts! Even if these are the same year and mint mark, they still have fascinating differences. The more of these I photograph, the more I am impressed by the effort put in by the original collector to put this set together. The set I bought was 1934-1991, pretty much all like what you see here. The pre-1934 coins had been stripped out, and probably sold separately by the dealer. I really wonder what they were like...
1939 completes my posts of the 1930's Lincolns. Even in a single year with fully red coins there are pleasing and subtle differences in color. These are all photographed with the same lighting and exposure.
That was obviously parked somewhere out of harms way for a long, long time. Great find. I hope you don't mind, but I think your pictures deserve to be seen bigger and better. Here they are.
The Philadelphia cent is just starting to tone above Liberty. The San Francisco mint hammered out a coin that managed to fully fill out the O in ONE, in contrast to the '38, '39, and '40 I posted above. For I while I was thinking that the roughness on the weakly struck O's was from contact with other coins in the mint. Then I realized that if the metal is not pushed fully up into the die, the surface won't be forced into a smooth texture. That was when I learned that the rough surface marks found on Lincoln's coat sleeve and on the O are often elements of the strike, and not of contact. This is a year grouping with color variations that I really like.
I have definately caught the Lincoln bug!!! "It is amazing how someone can get so excited over a penny!" Said my wife when I started collecting 3 weeks ago.
You're having too much fun, Ron. And your imagery is coming around nicely. The more lustrous Lincolns are not you - they're just that much more difficult to capture perfectly. Give me circulated copper under the lens every day; I'll look like a pro.
Thanks,Dave. I'm pleased with the progress, that they look so good already. I know I still have a lot to learn about adjusting light angle and exposure. I want to light up the toning and capture the feel of the luster. There are several things I enjoy about posting these. I pay respect to the original collector who built the set. As the current custodian I get to share his collection with everyone. Having bought 185 coins at once (1934-1991), I have a way to get to know each of them in detail. And I get to combine three of my interests at once. Coins and photography, obviously, and I have also had fun writing software to rename the images, straighten them, draw a cropping boundary around the coin, erase the background, and resize it for the web. Too much fun, indeed!
Then you've learned the most important aspect of coin photography - how vastly it deepens the numismatic experience. I know every single coin I own intimately. None have any secrets from me.