The MM may look good, but it is 100% in the wrong position. And, if I can see it, the dot after the D is/was in the wrong position.
how the heck do you fake a mint mark? it seems like it would be difficult because of how it would need to be bumpy... how do you add that?
When tooling was a common trade, years ago. Wish it was still was! Not good for numismatics though, unless making a Master Die. Back in the day these guys were pretty good ! Does any one have a pick of a mm with some Lustre left? Obviously a counterfeit.
Here is one of my Wheaties. On the reverse there is a small 1 & 9. I usually find "Wheaties" in penny rolls. It's like opening Christmas gifts.
Its raw. I know what to look for when it comes to these and this one has all the markers for the strong reverse. Compared to others I've seen i grade it at vg8
IMO, this date is much harder to find (with a strong rev) than a 1914 D. Does the strong rev indicate a eds? Any idea how many rev dies there were? Thanks.
There were 4 die combos. Die combo 2 is the strong reverse. After a big die clash the obverse was polished to remove the clash marks which removed the D mintmark and wore down some of the major devices. The reverse was damaged to the point they replaced it with a newer, less worn die. http://www.lincolncentresource.com/1922Ddievarieties.html Here are all the die pairs