Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Post Your Favorite Coins of Justinian I, AD 527-565
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="lehmansterms, post: 3264672, member: 80804"]I suspect that the operation was broken out into specific tasks and the guys holding the tongs on the reverse die and swinging the hammer just struck whatever blanks they were fed by the flan-making staff. Why a half-follis reverse die was used to strike a small flan on a follis obverse die is a bit harder to explain, but it seems fairly well established that the striking duo worked with more than one reverse die in rotation to allow them to cool between strikes. Perhaps the "tongs guy" (<i>suppositor)</i> was fed a smaller flan and chose a half-follis reverse (particularly if they were striking more than one denomination that day in that officina) without thinking about the obverse die in the anvil, then the "hammer guy" (<i>malleator)</i> just hit whatever was "presented" without questioning which die the suppositor had chosen or even being aware of the size of the blank.</p><p>Another possibility might be that near the end of the "shift", the half follis obverse die they were working with suffered a catastrophic break and a whole follis obverse die was the closest/easiest replacement to finish up the last of a consignment of blank flans.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="lehmansterms, post: 3264672, member: 80804"]I suspect that the operation was broken out into specific tasks and the guys holding the tongs on the reverse die and swinging the hammer just struck whatever blanks they were fed by the flan-making staff. Why a half-follis reverse die was used to strike a small flan on a follis obverse die is a bit harder to explain, but it seems fairly well established that the striking duo worked with more than one reverse die in rotation to allow them to cool between strikes. Perhaps the "tongs guy" ([I]suppositor)[/I] was fed a smaller flan and chose a half-follis reverse (particularly if they were striking more than one denomination that day in that officina) without thinking about the obverse die in the anvil, then the "hammer guy" ([I]malleator)[/I] just hit whatever was "presented" without questioning which die the suppositor had chosen or even being aware of the size of the blank. Another possibility might be that near the end of the "shift", the half follis obverse die they were working with suffered a catastrophic break and a whole follis obverse die was the closest/easiest replacement to finish up the last of a consignment of blank flans.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Post Your Favorite Coins of Justinian I, AD 527-565
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...