The first, I think is a struck through thread or wire. The second, I believe are just hits (if incused). I can't tell from the pics. Are the dots raised or incused? Personally, these are pretty minor and I hope you didn't get them slabbed just for that. The cost of slabbing really wouldn't be worth it.
Parts of the dots are indented, the other parts raised. Noone seems to know what they are, but the coin got a high grade from PCGS so I don't think it's damage. It was $50 to send it back to PCGS (they were already slabbed as 1st strikes)... I thought that I should since the error was on one of the reverse proofs. Both of these pics are of the same coin.
I wonder if these error types come from some adventurous soul at the Mint that wants to make collectors' lives more interesting? Could someone 'seed' the feeder with pre-struck coinage? How else would this happen?
Gee where did this zombie thread come from? Errors huh? Well I have a few Old ANACS MS-60. No date struck fragment with brockage. Pop 1 ANACS AU-50 1911 struck 10% off center Off center, flip over triple struck
1965 SMS Quarter on a Five Cent Planchet??? Maybe? Hi, I am completely new to this website, to threads and really to the coin world itself. I have been getting into coins within the last 6 months....long story short, I've been starting to pay attention to my change etc and today I got this 1965 quarter at a local liquor/convenient store. It just looks sooo different, feels different and plus the lettering looks off. I thought it could've been a nickel planchet error but maybe you guys could be the judge (the best you can from a picture)! Any way to weigh it or any significant signs to look for?Thanks...
Welcome to CoinTalk If it were struck on a Nickel Planchet the diameter would be smaller. Looks like it's been circulated enough to wear the clad surface. It's sooooo old that this would occur. IMHO it's just a plain old quarter.