Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
World Coins
>
Post your coins that came from famous collections....
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="robp, post: 13702901, member: 96746"]Thanks.</p><p><br /></p><p>You can do a certain amount of chronology using the coins. The Royalist issues were only struck to pay troops when there was an excess of demand over supplies of regular circulating coinage. No point making work for yourself if not necessary. </p><p><br /></p><p>You get the movement of a few marks which would correlate with the movement of armies. e.g Prince Maurice was in command at Exeter and Plymouth in 1643 and 1644 until he replaced Prince Rupert at Worcester in command of the Marches forces effective 1st December 1644. In 1643 and 1644 the mark at Exeter was a rose. This appears at a later date on some coins, e.g. the groat above. In the summer of 1644, Charles left Oxford and went to Droitwich which is near Worcester. Early W halfcrowns had a tower mark, which is also on the Worcester city arms, but this is only seen on obverse B. In 1645, Exeter coins adopt a tower mark. I think this is the same moneyer seen previously at Worcester, who went south with the king, stayed and replaced Maurice's man who headed north to Worcester. </p><p><br /></p><p>You can certainly identify individual engravers' movements. e.g. this 1644 C-4 halfcrown (ex-Chesser) from around New Year 1644 uses an easily identifiable E punch on the reverse die, which subsequently was used at W/SA on halfcrown obverse D. This was probably used in the final 3 months prior to the fall of Shrewsbury on 21-22 Feb. 1644/5. Note that roses have also appeared in the reverse legend.</p><p>[ATTACH=full]1530285[/ATTACH]</p><p>[ATTACH=full]1530286[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p>I think it is possible to match a good number of issues with the troop movements, but that would be far too much to discuss here. </p><p><br /></p><p>Bear in mind that the last field battle took place a few days before the end of 1645 at Stow on the Wold, so any issues post that date (21st March 1645/6) i.e anything dated 1646 had to be for a static location rather than a body of troops suddenly arriving from a campaign.</p><p><br /></p><p>I've only included pieces with a provenance in this thread, as per the title. I do have unprovenanced pieces as well.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="robp, post: 13702901, member: 96746"]Thanks. You can do a certain amount of chronology using the coins. The Royalist issues were only struck to pay troops when there was an excess of demand over supplies of regular circulating coinage. No point making work for yourself if not necessary. You get the movement of a few marks which would correlate with the movement of armies. e.g Prince Maurice was in command at Exeter and Plymouth in 1643 and 1644 until he replaced Prince Rupert at Worcester in command of the Marches forces effective 1st December 1644. In 1643 and 1644 the mark at Exeter was a rose. This appears at a later date on some coins, e.g. the groat above. In the summer of 1644, Charles left Oxford and went to Droitwich which is near Worcester. Early W halfcrowns had a tower mark, which is also on the Worcester city arms, but this is only seen on obverse B. In 1645, Exeter coins adopt a tower mark. I think this is the same moneyer seen previously at Worcester, who went south with the king, stayed and replaced Maurice's man who headed north to Worcester. You can certainly identify individual engravers' movements. e.g. this 1644 C-4 halfcrown (ex-Chesser) from around New Year 1644 uses an easily identifiable E punch on the reverse die, which subsequently was used at W/SA on halfcrown obverse D. This was probably used in the final 3 months prior to the fall of Shrewsbury on 21-22 Feb. 1644/5. Note that roses have also appeared in the reverse legend. [ATTACH=full]1530285[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]1530286[/ATTACH] I think it is possible to match a good number of issues with the troop movements, but that would be far too much to discuss here. Bear in mind that the last field battle took place a few days before the end of 1645 at Stow on the Wold, so any issues post that date (21st March 1645/6) i.e anything dated 1646 had to be for a static location rather than a body of troops suddenly arriving from a campaign. I've only included pieces with a provenance in this thread, as per the title. I do have unprovenanced pieces as well.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
World Coins
>
Post your coins that came from famous collections....
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...