Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Post your best ugliest ancients
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Curtis, post: 24716591, member: 26430"]Great early "captives" coinage of Constantine! Just added it to my file of captives types by ruler. I hadn't noticed it before (but now I see it's also got a row on the Assorted Reverses page: <a href="http://www.constantinethegreatcoins.com/asst3/" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://www.constantinethegreatcoins.com/asst3/" rel="nofollow">http://www.constantinethegreatcoins.com/asst3/</a>)</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Yes, a common experience for anyone who likes Countermarks! You must separate the host from the stamp (although it's always nice when both are attractive).</p><p><br /></p><p>Nice NCAPR example -- I recognize that one! From the Richard Baker Collection. I've got one of the Baker Collection NCAPR Sestertii -- he had a lot of them! (Mine's on a Claudius, probably Western unofficial mint.)</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH]1580400[/ATTACH] </p><p><br /></p><p>Here are (expandable) thumbnails from Baker's 1984 article in <i>SAN (Journal of the Society for Ancient Numismatics)</i> vol XV: 52-pp. 58. (HTML w/ link to PDF <a href="https://www.accla.org/actaaccla/baker2.html" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.accla.org/actaaccla/baker2.html" rel="nofollow">available from ACCLA</a>.)</p><p>[ATTACH]1580401[/ATTACH] [ATTACH]1580402[/ATTACH] </p><p><br /></p><p>That type is referenced as "Pangerl 60." Below is a coin with two "Pangerl 66" countermarks. Head of Helios radiate. </p><p><br /></p><p>These types (always?) appear in pairs; sometimes one is Helios standing (<a href="https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?term=%22Pangerl+65%22" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?term=%22Pangerl+65%22" rel="nofollow">Pangerl 65, which only appears in combination with Pangerl 66</a>). To my knowledge, no one has published a theory of why some got two heads (66 X2) and some got one standing & one head of Helios (65 + 66). (I have a hypothesis, but need to double-check my data...) </p><p><br /></p><p>I cleaned it from a total crusty about 20 years ago.</p><p><br /></p><p><b>Augustus Moneyer AE Dupondius [?] (28mm, 13.13g)</b>: </p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1580404[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Curtis, post: 24716591, member: 26430"]Great early "captives" coinage of Constantine! Just added it to my file of captives types by ruler. I hadn't noticed it before (but now I see it's also got a row on the Assorted Reverses page: [URL]http://www.constantinethegreatcoins.com/asst3/[/URL]) Yes, a common experience for anyone who likes Countermarks! You must separate the host from the stamp (although it's always nice when both are attractive). Nice NCAPR example -- I recognize that one! From the Richard Baker Collection. I've got one of the Baker Collection NCAPR Sestertii -- he had a lot of them! (Mine's on a Claudius, probably Western unofficial mint.) [ATTACH]1580400[/ATTACH] Here are (expandable) thumbnails from Baker's 1984 article in [I]SAN (Journal of the Society for Ancient Numismatics)[/I] vol XV: 52-pp. 58. (HTML w/ link to PDF [URL='https://www.accla.org/actaaccla/baker2.html']available from ACCLA[/URL].) [ATTACH]1580401[/ATTACH] [ATTACH]1580402[/ATTACH] That type is referenced as "Pangerl 60." Below is a coin with two "Pangerl 66" countermarks. Head of Helios radiate. These types (always?) appear in pairs; sometimes one is Helios standing ([URL='https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?term=%22Pangerl+65%22']Pangerl 65, which only appears in combination with Pangerl 66[/URL]). To my knowledge, no one has published a theory of why some got two heads (66 X2) and some got one standing & one head of Helios (65 + 66). (I have a hypothesis, but need to double-check my data...) I cleaned it from a total crusty about 20 years ago. [B]Augustus Moneyer AE Dupondius [?] (28mm, 13.13g)[/B]: [ATTACH=full]1580404[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Post your best ugliest ancients
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...