Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Barberian, post: 24683329, member: 24442&quot;]I just checked the photos of the 95 and 95-O and I may have posted the same obverse twice for both.&nbsp; The 95-O is correct (the 95 obverse is wrong).&nbsp; My scanning 12 coins at once caused some confusion in matching obverses with reverses here.</p><p><br /></p><p>I checked the 95-O and it has some etching and hairlines on the obverse.&nbsp; I&#039;m not confident it will straight grade.&nbsp; </p><p><br /></p><p>That hits on the problem I had trying to collect raw Barber halves off of eBay, i.e., so many Barber halves have been cleaned and I had trouble finding original coins.&nbsp; Eventually, I became disappointed with all the crappy Barbers I was buying and switched over to seated Liberty halves where I had better luck in landing raw, original-looking coins.&nbsp; I&#039;m now scanning my coins in preparation for eventually selling off my Barbers and reducing the size of my collection.</p><p><br /></p><p>Sheesh, I still have every Lincoln cent my brother and I pulled out of literally thousands of bank rolls as kids 55 years ago!&nbsp; Does anyone want a roll of circulated 60-D SDs?&nbsp; Or 1919 Lincolns?&nbsp; Or an entire set of Roosevelt dimes from change.&nbsp; Loads and loads of stuff from my early collecting days as a kid.&nbsp; My best finds: a 1921 dime in G, and a 1909 Lincoln cent in AU+ BN. Both blew my mind at the time.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in