Post your $50 to $100 coin purchase

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by calcol, Jul 26, 2019.

  1. Marshall

    Marshall Junior Member

    I'm not really into silver, but that's what I'd call cameo on a coin not produced specifically for that effect like moderns.
     
    Sunflower_Coins likes this.
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Marshall

    Marshall Junior Member

    Previously posted on the new acquisitions thread, but it qualifies here.

    This is $76 minus $15 in eBay Bucks I needed to use up. the uneven wear makes it difficult to grade with half the coin being 0 and half being F12. But its a 96 for less than $100. I've seen so many minor clips, I don't think it adds value at this point.

    1796 S-106.jpg
     
  4. Skyman

    Skyman Well-Known Member

  5. jgrinz

    jgrinz Senior Member

    $34
    PCGS MS-63

    1921p_VAM3CL1.jpg 1921p_VAM3CL2.jpg
     
    thomas mozzillo likes this.
  6. bradgator2

    bradgator2 Well-Known Member

  7. erscolo

    erscolo Well-Known Member

    1938P 10C MS65 FB NGC 4855575-013 Obverse.jpg 1938P 10C MS65 FB NGC 4855575-013 Reverse.jpg
    This coin was $96, so that fits in the range. This is a very recent, last week, purchase to build a mint state coin set for 1938. This 1938P Mercury dime is graded MS66 FB by NGC. Only the two quarters to go.
     
    thomas mozzillo, calcol and gronnh20 like this.
  8. Marshall

    Marshall Junior Member

    P001 DETAILS
    P001 DETAILS ENVIRONMENTAL DAMAGE
    P001 DETAILS CORROSION
    P001 DETAILS TOOLED
    P001 DETAILS HOLED
     
    Ariette and TypeCoin971793 like this.
  9. Mark Metzger

    Mark Metzger Well-Known Member

    This was part of a mixed lot of coins I just purchased but I would say it was “priced” in the $50-100 range. Slabbed MS-63 examples have sold in the $300-375 range. This would, in my opinion, grade MS if not for the obverse rim ding and the reverse gouge. Still a really cool so-called dollar.
    46C262A3-0707-4766-98C9-63994B6233FC.jpeg 3931A34F-AAFD-4274-85E4-65FA61BC48DB.jpeg
     
    gronnh20 and thomas mozzillo like this.
  10. Cheech9712

    Cheech9712 Every thing is a guess

    RRRRRRR
     
    Tracy62 and gronnh20 like this.
  11. thomas mozzillo

    thomas mozzillo Well-Known Member

    It's a very nice medallion but the designer sure didn't know how to write 1492 in Roman Numerals. lol :)
     
  12. Marshall

    Marshall Junior Member

    Was this minted in 1842-1843? Perhaps a 400th anniversary coin?
     
  13. Mark Metzger

    Mark Metzger Well-Known Member

    The obverse roman numerals read 1492 (MCCCCXCII) while the reverse read 1892 (MDCCCXCII) and 1893 (MDCCCXCIII) which were the years of the 400th anniversary celebration exposition (hence the two years of the commemorative half dollar).
     
    Magnus87 and Marshall like this.
  14. john65999

    john65999 Well-Known Member

  15. Marshall

    Marshall Junior Member

    messed up. Can't delete.
     

    Attached Files:

  16. Marshall

    Marshall Junior Member

    This was $63.95. it's an eBay purchase that was relisted at least once. I tried to get it under $50 but the seller wouldn't budge. I decided not to sweat $15.

    1801 S-213 3.jpg

    It's a common S-213, fairly early Die State. Detail up to XF in places and no corrosion. But severely damaged. I sort of specialize in these misfits.
     
    Last edited: Jul 28, 2020
    -jeffB, calcol and C-B-D like this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page