Post your 2018 Highlights!

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by 1916D10C, Dec 13, 2018.

  1. 1916D10C

    1916D10C Key Date Mercs are Life! 1916-D/1921-D/1921

    Well then, take them outside behind the convention center! ;)
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. TypeCoin971793

    TypeCoin971793 Just a random guy on the internet

    I can think of many reasons:

    1. So you can see them when your physical coins are not available

    2. So you can learn how different aspects affect the picture of a coin, so you can get a better read of the coin in the picture

    3. So you can share your coins on sites like this

    4. So if you are trying to teach someone about a small aspect of a certain coin, you can blow up a picture and highlight exactly what you are talking about

    And I could go on
     
  4. V. Kurt Bellman

    V. Kurt Bellman Yes, I'm blunt! Get over your "feeeeelings".

    1) no such time of significance exists.

    2) Whuuuut?

    3) Don’t care.

    4) I can and do that on an as needed basis, at time of need.
     
  5. TypeCoin971793

    TypeCoin971793 Just a random guy on the internet

    You are paranoid of eBay because you can’t interpret pictures well. Learning how to take pictures would greatly improve that skill.
     
  6. 1916D10C

    1916D10C Key Date Mercs are Life! 1916-D/1921-D/1921

    Typecoin- please don't start the bickering and lecturing in my thread. Please.
     
  7. ddddd

    ddddd Member

    This Proof US-Philippines Peso has a great design, lovely colors, and offers better value to me than a more expensive want (a proof Morgan):
    552474-5.jpg

    And a Morgan (obverse is not toned):
    635040-1.jpg
     
  8. 1916D10C

    1916D10C Key Date Mercs are Life! 1916-D/1921-D/1921

    That Phillipine coin is gorgeous. Were those minted at one of the U.S. Mints?
     
    ddddd likes this.
  9. V. Kurt Bellman

    V. Kurt Bellman Yes, I'm blunt! Get over your "feeeeelings".

    These? Yes, San Fran.
     
    1916D10C likes this.
  10. ddddd

    ddddd Member

  11. V. Kurt Bellman

    V. Kurt Bellman Yes, I'm blunt! Get over your "feeeeelings".

    I am literally an award winning photographer in national competitions. The problem in photographing coins is in the subject matter's basic nature, not a lack of technique. It's the same with portraiture. Lighting angles make ALL the difference, and I can NEVER assume whether an Internet coin seller is attempting to reveal or conceal, and neither can you. The only difference is, I know it.
     
    1916D10C likes this.
  12. TypeCoin971793

    TypeCoin971793 Just a random guy on the internet

    This is basic coin photography knowledge.

    And by knowing that knowledge, one can successfully see through almost any eBay seller photographic charade. And if it was impossible like you say, then why could I successfully predict the in-hand appearance of almost every single coin I bought on eBay?

    This was a conversation started with an innocent discussion on the merits of photographing one’s coins.

    And with that I am done with this tangent. As you have said, some people here are staunchly set in their views, and nothing would be enough to convince them otherwise.
     
  13. V. Kurt Bellman

    V. Kurt Bellman Yes, I'm blunt! Get over your "feeeeelings".

    Well, you must just exude magical fairy dust, I figger. This is the Photoshop (and similar) generation. You can never tell ANYTHING about a coin pictured on the Internet that is from a seller with whom you don't have a pre-existing relationship of trust.

    Mannnn, you should see the digital "nose jobs" and umm, err, "augmentations" I performed as a photographer in the film/digital borderlands. I shot medium format AND 4x5 sheet film and had great scanners AND film recorders to bang out new "original" negatives. Why so big? Because before that I did MANUAL retouching, with dyes, a brush, and an airbrush.
     
    Last edited: Dec 14, 2018
    1916D10C likes this.
  14. robec

    robec Junior Member

    Tough to limit it to two.

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     
  15. 1916D10C

    1916D10C Key Date Mercs are Life! 1916-D/1921-D/1921

    @robec , Any idea why the 1937-D didn't get a higher grade? I mean that thing looks positively flawless. I can't find a single hit anywhere. Is the luster muted? I think it looks better than the bottom one.
     
    robec likes this.
  16. robec

    robec Junior Member

    Originally it was NGC MS66BN. The first time PCGS saw it they graded it 64BN. This wasn’t during their current conservative phase. It happened about 5 years ago. I believe it should be 66. Luster is above average and the surfaces are as clean and spot/mark free as any Ive seen. I don’t have an answer, but eventually I’ll be sending it in again.
     
    1916D10C likes this.
  17. 1916D10C

    1916D10C Key Date Mercs are Life! 1916-D/1921-D/1921

    So what would keep it from 67? I don't understand, it looks flawless.
     
    robec likes this.
  18. robec

    robec Junior Member

    Unless there are some 1937-D’s in 67 that are clearly superior in comparison, I haven’t a clue. I didn’t want to be a homer by saying this should be 67. I know ownership adds at least 1 point, but I agree with you.
     
    1916D10C likes this.
  19. Santinidollar

    Santinidollar Supporter! Supporter

    Only two? OK. You da boss. I’ll divide my two into gold and silver. Not only are they nice, your humble tightwad here got both at very nice prices.


    And the winner of the most outstanding old gold acquisition of 2018 is:

    EF453B00-6EFF-415E-AA82-34C0D784E792.jpeg 3C370B39-90C1-4059-936B-81BB355D3EB2.jpeg 41C480A8-C953-4126-BEBD-E58F45EFBA7F.jpeg

    And now for the most outstanding silver acquisition of 2018:

    C9360C5D-0331-4BC1-9EC2-7C4428C6D822.jpeg 1359ACB1-B398-48E3-A158-FA3C25923265.jpeg 50DA5FA7-0529-4688-87AF-58FDDD71B940.jpeg
     
  20. charlottedude

    charlottedude Novice Collector

    My one and only major purchase for the year.

    1802-1 HE Cac.jpg
     
    ddddd, Coinsailor, NLL and 4 others like this.
  21. V. Kurt Bellman

    V. Kurt Bellman Yes, I'm blunt! Get over your "feeeeelings".

    Wow, when you go “one and only”, you go big time!
     
    charlottedude likes this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page