Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;gbroke, post: 1451195, member: 22585&quot;]Hmm, never noticed. It does look a little strange. Here it is compared to another 74-s brown boxer.</p><p>It certainly looks stubby compared to the other one. </p><p>So yeah, I have no clue.</p><p><img src="http://www.thecoinnection.com/tempimages/ikemintmark.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p>A quick check on the Ike Group site..Maybe this:</p><p><br /></p><p>&quot;<span style="color: #000000"><font face="Times New Roman">1.&nbsp; <b><span style="color: red">DIVA SP 1974-S MICRO-S</span></b> --- The S appears smaller than the DIVA 1974-S &quot;S/S Doubled Punch&quot; mintmark and there is proof field visible in both eyes.</font></span>&quot;</p><p><br /></p><p>&quot;<span style="color: red"><font face="Times New Roman">DIVA SP 1974-S MICRO-S</font></span><span style="color: #000000"><font face="Times New Roman">&nbsp; or the Silver Proof 1974-s (Wile’s Style1) mint mark has been used across many years and many denominations of coins.&nbsp;&nbsp; In the 1974 Eisenhower Dollars it is estimated that approximately 10,000 were minted.&nbsp; The low estimated mintage makes this coin a natural selection for inclusion in any advanced Eisenhower Dollar Collection.</font></span>&quot;[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in