Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Ike Skywalker, post: 3174758, member: 82381&quot;]I received a new Ike in the mail today- my first MS68 silver business: 1972-S. Boy oh boy, am I happy with this latest upgrade. It is far and away MUCH better than my 67. The difference is striking. Lots of photos for this one &#039;cause I&#039;m excited about it.</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]816783[/ATTACH] </p><p>[ATTACH=full]816784[/ATTACH] </p><p>Side by side comparison in the same shot:</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]816785[/ATTACH] </p><p><br /></p><p>Side by side comparison in separate shots under identical lighting conditions. Here, you can see that the strike quality of the 68 is far superior. It has to be a fresh die strike. It has that glossy, SMS proof-like appearance, very much UNLIKE the 67.</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]816786[/ATTACH] </p><p><br /></p><p>One more extreme angle showing the PL quality:</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]816787[/ATTACH] </p><p><br /></p><p>It&#039;s the same with the reverse:</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]816788[/ATTACH] </p><p><br /></p><p>I also have a 1974-S (PCGS MS68) upgrade on the way from Heritage. It appears to have lots of satiny frost throughout. That&#039;s what the TrueView indicates anyway. I&#039;m hoping it will be just as nice as my new 72-S. Stay tuned....[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in