Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Lehigh96, post: 1751036, member: 15309&quot;]While I agree with your basic premise that MA or QT is a better partition than AT or NT, it is not a line that is crossed, rather a sliding scale. Some coins reach the level where we can say 99.9% that they are QT which is tantamount to just calling them AT. Do you remember this photo that I created a few years ago?</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><img src="http://i117.photobucket.com/albums/o59/ACPitBoss/Jefferson%20Nickels%20Raw/ToningScaleFirst.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /><img src="http://i117.photobucket.com/albums/o59/ACPitBoss/Jefferson%20Nickels%20Raw/ToningScaleLast.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>The real problem is that this thread is designed to be a way for people to share their toned coins with other collectors and to teach people about toning. Your incessant posting of clearly AT coins without declaring them either AT or QT basically undermines the entire purpose of this thread.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in