Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;WingedLiberty, post: 1496442, member: 26030&quot;]I am with you Robec!!!!&nbsp; I have one to substantiate your point.&nbsp; </p><p><br /></p><p>Here is an iPhone photo of an 1886 Indian Cent (shot in indirect sunlight) vs. a TrueView.&nbsp; &nbsp; I can tell you that the iPhone photo is COMPLETELY RAW and not enhanced (post-processed) in any way (you can tell by the slab label color and my thumb color, which both look completely &quot;normal&quot;.) </p><p><br /></p><p>A lot of collectors don&#039;t realize that when you see an &quot;over the top&quot; looking TrueView photo, they reflect &quot;over the top&quot; coins.&nbsp; Also most toned coins show different looks at various viewing and lighting angles.&nbsp; So a toned coin can take on tens or hundreds of different &quot;looks&quot; and what is captured in a photo is just one look.&nbsp; </p><p><br /></p><p><img src="https://mindstar.com/cointalk_photos/1886_phils_angle.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p><img src="https://mindstar.com/cointalk_photos/TVBlack_1886Indian.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" />[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in