He says at the end of the description: ONE CAN THEREFORE UNDERSTAND WHY U.S. MINT PROOF SETS APPRECIATE IN VALUE. I bought a proof set in 1988, $8. Value today, $8. Old LCS offer $5.
Wow check this listing and some of his others https://rover.ebay.com/rover/0/0/0?mpre=https://www.ebay.com/ulk/itm/253618595885
And this. I can't imagine sending coins like these to be graded to begin with trying to sell them as genuine errors even after getting details damage grade takes the cake lol. https://rover.ebay.com/rover/0/0/0?mpre=https://www.ebay.com/ulk/itm/222817606746
Now the golden question. Does eBay take these quack listings down if reported? I have had some issues where I sold a legitimate item and now i'm getting the shaft so I may be on a spree of reporting. Or do these qualify as legitimate listings due to crap eBay policy?
OK Dumb question. It looks like damage from a coin rolling machine. Yes? How could NGC certify as a strike through?
"double date double mint" . Does that mean they were each struck at more than one mint or that there's gum on them? And PCGS forgot to attribute those things. Hey, they must be rare error slabs!