Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;imrich, post: 3420719, member: 22331&quot;]You have summated well, upon which the courts are likely to all agree. To what degree has the raw product improved in value, if any, since it&#039;s manufacture is the question? Who, what establishes that improvement amount, as this example generally states?: <a href="https://www.pcgs.com/grades" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.pcgs.com/grades" rel="nofollow">https://www.pcgs.com/grades</a></p><p><br /></p><p>There is a published written and illustrated believed only court acceptable standard which was generated before TPG were prominently established. If various firms decide to use that standard, can they arbitrarily change that standard? Can they change that standard without like-kind (to original) definition of the changes? Can they and others set values without guarantee value bonding for those products, as has been federally established in some jurisdictions?</p><p><br /></p><p>It&#039;s believed that subjective changes to an established published system must be shown as addendum with like-kind documentation of changes. That/those firm(s) using the deviated standard probably should not state that they are grading based/using the original 70 grade system.</p><p><br /></p><p>It&#039;s believed there isn&#039;t any reason why these firms can&#039;t declare use of a modified s****** (e.g. smarter) system, rather than modifying a system that can currently be readily used to determine relative values other than intrinsic. They could then have an infinite number of grades, each having an individual definition. </p><p><br /></p><p>Is an oxidized-corroded or damaged legal monetary object worth more than its base/assigned value? Can it be determined &quot;mint-state&quot; XX? Who should make that determination, the buyer? NOT!!(as defined by many) LOL</p><p><br /></p><p>I&#039;m concerned about the past enactment of restrictive posting requirements on commercial intermediary sales sites, of firms without believed court allowable standards, as was seen in the PCI lawsuit. These conditions may require more restrictive/subjective RICO application used in the PCI action.</p><p><br /></p><p>I would believe grading to a written standard should allow more protection for all parties in a commercial transaction.</p><p><br /></p><p>JMHO[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in