Possible new discovery.

Discussion in 'Error Coins' started by Spooky$Bread, Jun 14, 2021.

?

How i go about getting errors confirmed and getting coin authenticated.

  1. Information on coin

    100.0%
  2. Known errors

    100.0%
Multiple votes are allowed.
  1. Spooky$Bread

    Spooky$Bread New Member

    Greetings my fellow coin collectors. I have a 1866 2 cent coin that i found digging through some boxes of my father's belongings. I took a close look at them with my microscope and found a possible double or triple die error and a strike through grease and was wondering how i would go about getting them authenticated? I have some good photos as well and would really appreciate all input and help in pointing me in the right direction.
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Scott J

    Scott J Well-Known Member

    I don't know, but definitely post the photos.
     
  4. SensibleSal66

    SensibleSal66 Casual Collector / error expert "in Training "

    Than You ! Oh. that's me on the far right . LOL THISTHREADISUSELESSWITHOUTPICHERS.jpg
     
    yakpoo likes this.
  5. Jeffjay

    Jeffjay Well-Known Member

    The way to get input and help here is to post photos.
     
  6. yakpoo

    yakpoo Member

    Both PCGS and NGC certify varieties but attribution is limited to documented varieties by recognized authorities. If you actually have discovered a new variety, you would first need to have it recognized by the associated authority. That's where pictures would help us point you in the right direction.
     
  7. paddyman98

    paddyman98 Let me burst your bubble! Supporter

    Ok..

    The correct numismatic terminology would be Doubled Die and Tripled Die.. Not double or triple.
    Know what you are looking for before you try to figure it out. That's a big newbie mistake.

    And you need to post pictures
     
  8. MeowtheKitty

    MeowtheKitty Well-Known Member

    You guys needed better matching clothes. Or where you going for the homeless village people look?
     
    yakpoo and SensibleSal66 like this.
  9. John Burgess

    John Burgess Well-Known Member

    Welcome to the forum,
    Says has pictures, doesn't show pictures.
    My input is, I'm skeptical and not going further without pictures.

    they say a picture is worth a thousand words.....
     
  10. yakpoo

    yakpoo Member

    It looks like I'm the only vote in the poll. :(
     
  11. PlanoSteve

    PlanoSteve Well-Known Member

    Now there are 2 of us! :D
     
    yakpoo likes this.
  12. Mr.Q

    Mr.Q Well-Known Member

    Pictures please, thank you.
     
  13. John Wright

    John Wright Well-Known Member

    Sensible, your group-picture is priceless and is well-worth repeating for every deserving posting.
     
  14. John Burgess

    John Burgess Well-Known Member

    I found a new continent, I have pictures too unlike that Columbus guy.
     
    Timewarp likes this.
  15. Oldhoopster

    Oldhoopster Member of the ANA since 1982

    There a number of known repunched dates in the 2 Cent series. Post a clear, cropped pic of the date as well as the front and back of the coin. I don't have access to my reference books, but I'm sure other members have copies and can help attribute it
     
    Timewarp likes this.
  16. coinquest1961

    coinquest1961 Well-Known Member

    There's a very nice doubled die already known for the date, most visible on "OF AMERICA." See the Cherrypicker's Guide for an image. It is not overly rare in the circulated grades.
     
  17. Mountain Man

    Mountain Man Supporter! Supporter

    Not trying to be snide or negative, but you having been a member here for almost a year, has me wondering if you are just curious, or an actual collector. If you followed CT regularly, you could have answered your own question.
    Without photos, not much most of us can suggest. Probably a waste of your money to have a TPG tell you what you have.
     
    John Burgess likes this.
  18. desertgem

    desertgem MODERATOR Senior Errer Collecktor Moderator

    Also, you should look up Longacre's doubling as it is often confused with true doubling on a few of the coins of that era. Jim
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page