Possible Lamination Errors

I'm curious if these marks are a genuine lamination error, or simply damage. Thanks for the help

 

Log in or Sign up to hide this ad.

You should try and post one coin per thread and both sides of the coin.

 

Got it, thank you

 

The 1948 is a lamination (I see you posted this in a separate thread). All the others are damaged

 

Only the 1948 Cent has a Lamination Crack. The rest of the coins show circulation damage.

 

As above, only the '48 cent is laminated.

The rest are damaged.

 

Thanks guys, appreciate the help

 

Now that others have answered your question, would you please answer mine?

"Why are all but the 1948 Lincoln cent considered PMD?"

Chris

 

Lamination on Lincolns always looks like the top of brownies out of the oven. I like Lamination errors because they are actually "de"lamination errors.

 

The 1948 has a lamination error but all of the other coins are damaged.

 

Well, as far as I know, the 1948 is the only coin with an actual crack. The other few have scrapes and peels that could be the result of PMD. I am fairly new with errors though.

 

The reason I'm asking is to help you learn. You will find that there will be far more damaged coins than errors and varieties. So, by recognizing those that are worthless will save you a lot of wasted time.

Chris