Possible DDO-001 1951-D Lincoln Cent with RPM Too

Discussion in 'Error Coins' started by Rick Stachowski, Oct 2, 2013.

  1. Rick Stachowski

    Rick Stachowski Motor City Car Capital

    wexler 1800x
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Rick Stachowski

    Rick Stachowski Motor City Car Capital

    One last thing everybody, this coin also has doubling on the lower left wheat stem, and the O in OF A017 - 20131002_105616 (2).jpg
     
  4. BooksB4Coins

    BooksB4Coins Newbieus Sempiterna

    Is it growing? ;)





    I am sorry, but magnification is not the issue here, Rick.


    Go back and look at the photos you posted in #9. This alone, and even if we ignore everything else, is more than enough to prove this is not the variety you're hoping for. Supposed equipment or lighting “issues” cannot take away from or add to what simply, and clearly is not there.
     
    jay4202472000 likes this.
  5. jay4202472000

    jay4202472000 Well-Known Member

    Just trying to make a point, but yes it is now 5,000,000 thicker. :p
     
    furryfrog02 likes this.
  6. BooksB4Coins

    BooksB4Coins Newbieus Sempiterna

    Sometimes exaggeration is necessary... or else it's one heck of a large cent. ;)
     
    jay4202472000 likes this.
  7. jello

    jello Not Expert★NormL®

    1 thing cointalk has teaches a lot of assets2cointalk.
    :) photo can be different as not all are done @ site noted operator.;)Read-> who did Photo.

    http://coppercoins.com/lincoln/diestate.php?date=1946&die_id=1946d1mm010&die_state=lds
     
  8. BooksB4Coins

    BooksB4Coins Newbieus Sempiterna

    Very nice, Angelo!

    I will not dispute the fact that photos/images can have an effect on the subject's appearance, but the OP's insistence that his equipment "issues" is the reason the coins do not appear to be of the same variety is simply not the case.


     
  9. justafarmer

    justafarmer Senior Member

    Coppercoins' website contains an image of 1951-D 1DO-001 with mintmark and date. Comparing that with the OP's image will show that although the mintmarks of both coins are in the same approximate location the orientaion (rotation/tilt) are significantly different.

    Anyway - I don't think any attributor (Wexler, CONECA, COPPERCOINS) list a Doubled Die Obverse variety for 1951-D which also contains an RPM. And Wexler lists over 75 RPMs for this date.
     
    jello likes this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page