Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;satootoko, post: 134747, member: 669&quot;]Steve - you might be interested to learn:</p><p><br /></p><ul> <li>The Fourth Amendment prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures by government respresentatives, and requires probable cause to be shown for the issuance of a warrant.&nbsp; I&#039;ve seen nothing to suggest that Ruben is a government agent who has searched your property, seized your property, or executed an improperly issued warrant.<br /> </li> <li>The Fifth Amendment regulates the government in&nbsp; two aspects -multiple&nbsp; protections of the rights of persons accused of crime,&nbsp; and a requirement of due process and compensation for the taking of private property.&nbsp; Until and unless you are at least interviewed by law enforcement officers who suspect you of crime the first group of rights don&#039;t come into play, and Ruben doesn&#039;t have the power of eminent domain with or without compensation.<br /> </li> <li>The Sixth Amendment provides further rights - including right to counsel, speedy trial and jury trial - to criminal defendants.&nbsp; Have I missed the part where Ruben became a US Attorney or a local District/States Attorney and after charging you formally with crime, denied you counsel, or one of the other Sixth Amendment rights?<br /> </li> <li> The Twelfth Amendment is entirely devoted to procedures for the election of the President and Vice President.&nbsp;&nbsp; Is your real name Al Gore, and are you complaining that Ruben is responsible for your loss of the election?</li> </ul><p><br /></p><p>I&#039;ve tried to avoid responding to your many, many misstatements of the law in multiple posts, but this last post was just too off the wall to ignore.</p><p><br /></p><p>BTW I have been a member of the California State Bar since 1965, and admitted to practice before the US Supreme Court since 1971.&nbsp; What law school did you flunk out of<img src="http://bestsmileys.com/bunny/25.gif" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" />.</p><p><br /></p><p>In all fairness, I must point out that Ruben&#039;s views of the law are not completely accurate either.&nbsp; He fails to recognize that not every violation of good ethics is a violation of law, and he has overstated EBay&#039;s legal obligations and liabilities to some extent.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in