Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Vess1, post: 2397146, member: 13650&quot;]Hey I&#039;m not dissed.&nbsp;&nbsp; There&#039;s no hard feelings about it and I&#039;m not disagreeing about the &quot;official&quot; commemorative license some people feel these need to be collected.&nbsp; </p><p>&nbsp;&nbsp; Some of what the mint has done with this I can&#039;t and have no desire to defend.&nbsp; &nbsp; Ive just arrived at the point where I&#039;m accepting what it is and anticipate that some of the worries will be set aside once product is in peoples hands. </p><p><br /></p><p>&nbsp; No doubt the strike up issues are completely due to the use of pure gold and the limits of the size of the planchets.&nbsp;&nbsp; Problems should have been rooted out and changed.</p><p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; As someone else stated, they needed to use an even number for marketing despite the fact that most of us would&#039;ve rather seen exact dimensions regardless of final gold weight.&nbsp;&nbsp; Another fraction of a fraction of an oz would&#039;ve went a long way.</p><p><br /></p><p>&nbsp;But then again, they wanted to stamp the weight on them and if they couldn&#039;t strike a neat little &quot;1/10th&quot; then what would it be?&nbsp; Maybe a simple &quot;1/10+&quot; wouldve been adequate to get the job done but now it&#039;s getting sloppy in the eyes of some.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in