Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
[Poll-17] #15 Jay GT4 vs #31 TypeCoin (Round 2) CIT 2018
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Curtisimo, post: 3162864, member: 83845"]Hello everyone and welcome to Round 2 of the 2018 CoinTalk Imperator Tournament! If you are unaware of the tournament I invite you to get caught up with all the fun in the master thread;</p><p><br /></p><p><a href="https://www.cointalk.com/threads/ancients-it%E2%80%99s-time-the-second-annual-coin-imperator-tournament-2018.320328/" class="internalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.cointalk.com/threads/ancients-it%E2%80%99s-time-the-second-annual-coin-imperator-tournament-2018.320328/">https://www.cointalk.com/threads/ancients-it’s-time-the-second-annual-coin-imperator-tournament-2018.320328/</a></p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]812415[/ATTACH] </p><p><br /></p><p>A big thank you to all of our participants. Please review the below entries and cast your votes accordingly. Without further ado…</p><p><br /></p><p style="text-align: center">............................................................</p><p><br /></p><p><font size="7"><span style="color: #808080"><u><b>#15 [USER=88526]@Jay GT4[/USER] </b></u></span></font></p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]812400[/ATTACH] </p><p><font size="3">Marcus Lepidus Imperator</font></p><p><font size="3">Laureate head of Roma (?) right</font></p><p><font size="3">M LEPIDVS</font></p><p><font size="3">Below equestrian statue of M. Aemelius Lepidus (consul 187 and 175 BC) right, carrying trophy</font></p><p><font size="3">Rome, 61 BC</font></p><p><font size="3">3.79g</font></p><p><font size="3">Rare!</font></p><p><font size="3">Sear 371, RPC 419/1, CRR 827-828b</font></p><p><font size="3">Freed from a NGC Holder, graded strike 4/5; surface 4/5.</font></p><p><br /></p><p><b><u>Price:</u></b> $250</p><p><br /></p><p><b><u>Why It’s Cool:</u></b></p><p><u>The History:</u> While there are other common Republican coins struck by people named Marcus Lepidus which look similar, this one is actually quite special and rare. This coin is by the Imperator Marcus Lepidus.</p><p><br /></p><p>Marcus Lepidus struck this coin early in his career as moneyer and well before he became a member of the 2nd Triumvirate. The reverse commemorates his ancestor M. Amelius Lepidus who was consul in 187 BC and again in 175 BC. This coin was struck in 61 BC.</p><p><br /></p><p>Marcus Lepidus was married to Brutus’ sister (yes that Brutus). He was an early important supporter of Julius Caesar and later Antony. After Julius Caesar’s assassination he was instrumental in brokering the reconciliation between Antony and Octavian which led to the formalization of the 2nd triumvirate. Lepidus was named Consul and left in charge of Italy while Antony and Octavian chased after Brutus and Cassius. He was also confirmed as Pontifex Maximus (Chief Priest). In time he would be pushed aside by Antony and Octavian and only be allowed to govern North Africa. After an ill fated attempt to seize Sicily, his troops defected to Octavian and he was striped of all power and exiled to Cerceii. Despite this, he would be allowed to keep his post as Pontifex Maximus until his death. The office then became the sole procession of the Emperors. </p><p><br /></p><p><u>The coin:</u> I got this one on ebay from a seller who was taking offers. Originally listed at over $600 I put in a low ball offer of $250 in hopes of negotiating and was pleasantly surprised it was accepted. Coins of this type and in this condition are listed for over $900 (If you can find one for sale). Currently there is only one on Vcoins for $975 and one sold in Gemini 14 for $550 plus fees. The coin comes in 2 variations, one with the legend <b>AN•XV•PR•H•O•C•S•</b> and like this one, without the legend but with the exergue <b>M LEPIDVS</b></p><p><br /></p><p><u> The Break out:</u> As a bonus this coin came entombed in an NGC Holder graded Strike: 4/5; Surface: 4/5. The first thing I did was to free Lepidus from his plastic prison and set him in his proper place in my Imperators coin tray beside Antony, Octavian and Caesar.</p><p><br /></p><p style="text-align: center">............................................................</p><p><br /></p><p><font size="7"><span style="color: #808080"><u><b>#31 [USER=78244]@TypeCoin971793[/USER] </b></u></span></font></p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]812405[/ATTACH] </p><p><font size="3">Xin Dynasty, Wang Mang (10-14 AD)</font></p><p><font size="3">Obverse: 大布黃千 Da Bu Huang Qian(“Great Spade Valued 1000”)</font></p><p><font size="3">Reverse: Blank</font></p><p><font size="3">H-9.29 (normally 60 x 25 mm), FD 484/5</font></p><p><font size="3">Weight: 13.53g</font></p><p><font size="3">Size: 53 x 23mm</font></p><p><br /></p><p><b><u>Price:</u></b> $40</p><p><br /></p><p><b><u>Why It’s Cool:</u></b></p><p>There are few rulers who are best known for their numismatic legacy, and fewer still who are also remembered for nearly destroying their civilization. Wang Mang is one of these. Wang Mang was born into one of the most powerful families in China and was related to the ruling family and the emperor himself. Despite this, Wang Mang became an introspective and thrifty Confucian scholar, abhorring the lavish and wasteful lifestyles enjoyed by the rest of his family when so much of China’s population could barely feed themselves. He would also give away much of his excess wealth, making him extremely popular among the commoners and elite alike. Wang was said to become humbler the further he was promoted to positions of power. As his power grew, so did his popularity.</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]812406[/ATTACH]</p><p><i><font size="3">Wang Mang (image from <a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wang_Mang" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wang_Mang" rel="nofollow">Wikipedia</a>) </font></i></p><p><br /></p><p>Wang Mang deftly used his family connections, his popularity, and some questionable manipulation of the traditional imperial succession to take advantage of every situation and eventually forced himself to become acting emperor for a child whom he hand-picked to be emperor. With this power, he introduced fiduciary knife coins in 7 AD to confiscate all of the gold of the nobility. He used knives because they hearkened to the Zhou Dynasty, what Confucians considered to be the ideal standard for government and society. Within two years he demonetized these coins, destroying the wealth and power of the nobility overnight. With this, he took over the throne in 9 AD as emperor and established his Xin (“New”) Dynasty.</p><p><br /></p><p>Wang Mang immediately instituted many radical reforms, namely:</p><p><br /></p><p>1. The abolition of slavery through a ruinous tax on slave owners. </p><p><br /></p><p>2. The nationalization of land, essentially making the government own all of it. </p><p><br /></p><p>3. Distributing the land evenly among the population, so each family would have around 5 acres. </p><p><br /></p><p>4. Families were grouped into “chings,” which consisted of 6-8 families. This was an attempt to return to the traditional Zhou “well field” system.</p><p><br /></p><p>5. A national bank that will offer fair interest rates to everyone in the population. </p><p><br /></p><p>6. Government intervention in the markets to control and stabilize prices. It would buy up good when they are cheap to raise the price, and it would sell the excess during hard times to lower the price.</p><p><br /></p><p>7. A coinage system with 15 denominations ranging from a value of 1 to 1000. The value 1, 10, 20, 30, 40, and 50 coins were in the shape of familiar cash coins. The value 100, 200, 300, ... , 1000 coins were in the shape of spades, emulating Zhou spade coinage. In addition, there were 12 other traditional denominations using the following conversions:</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]812408[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p>Wang Mang’s justification for these coins: “If all currency is large, when one needs a small amount it is not available. If it is small [like the Wu Zhus currently in circulation], transporting it is troublesome and expensive. If large and small exist, then their use is convenient.” This sounds a lot like the currency system in place today, showing just how far ahead of his time he was.</p><p><br /></p><p>8. An annual income tax of 10% on money earned or crop yields per working individual. </p><p><br /></p><p>The sudden and drastic changes to a society built off maintaining tradition were met with much resentment and opposition. Some of the above reforms failed so horribly that they were rescinded in 12 AD. Wang Mang tried to force the populace to use his new coins and abandon the Wu Zhu. Given the track record with the knife coins, the populace understandably did not trust this new coinage. Wang Mang responded by making the use and possession of Wu Zhus punishable by death. Since no one wanted the new coins, trade and thus the entire economy ground to a halt. Millions starved, and many rebellions began. These were desperate times for all. </p><p><br /></p><p>(This is running long, so to catch the rest of the story of failure and degeneration, visit my thread: <a href="https://www.cointalk.com/threads/gold-inlaid-knife-coin-the-fascinating-story-of-the-rise-and-fall-of-wang-mang.315047/" class="internalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.cointalk.com/threads/gold-inlaid-knife-coin-the-fascinating-story-of-the-rise-and-fall-of-wang-mang.315047/">https://www.cointalk.com/threads/gold-inlaid-knife-coin-the-fascinating-story-of-the-rise-and-fall-of-wang-mang.315047/</a> )</p><p><br /></p><p>So, with the ownership and use of the plentiful Western Han “Wu Zhus” punishable by death, they became great fodder for being melted down and cast into counterfeits of Wang Mang’s highly-inflated coins. Due to the amount of profit gleaned from counterfeiting these coins, counterfeiting was rampant. Wang Mang initially responded by executing anyone caught counterfeiting. As this did not have any effect, Wang ordered that the counterfeiter and his entire family would become slaves of the state. This also did not work, so the punishment was escalated to the entire “ching” of six families being held responsible for the counterfeiter, and they would all become slaves of the state even if only one member was caught. It is said that 7 of every 10 people sentenced to slavery died from the hardship. (As an aside, Wang Mang also tried to curb counterfeiting by making it illegal to own bronze or charcoal. Needless to say, this order did not last long.)</p><p><br /></p><p>So, about the coin. It is a value-1000 spade from the coinage reform of 10 AD. However, it is much smaller than normal issues, and the style is slightly different (namely the flatness of the strokes and the malformation of the rim. From this, I conclude that it is a contemporary counterfeit. This is significant and exciting because it represents the desperation China’s people felt at this time, especially given the draconian punishments should the counterfeiter be caught. Making this coin involved a sheer amount of risk. Holding this coin makes me wonder the fate of it maker: was he ever caught? How severe was his punishment? Did his family suffer? What about his neighbors? This is what makes this coin so cool. This spade type generally sells for $90-120. I was willing to spend that much or even more for this coolness factor, so I considered $40 to be an absolute bargain.</p><p><br /></p><p>Here is a picture of this coin sitting next to an official issue so you can see the differences in size and style.</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]812410[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p style="text-align: center">............................................................</p><p><br /></p><p><b><font size="5"><span style="color: #808080"><u>A Gentle Reminder</u></span></font></b></p><p>Round 1 went about as well as anyone could have hoped from the perspective of keeping the commentary fun, interesting and friendly. It would be a challenge to run a tournament of this type on almost any other board but with the great people here on CT it has been both an honor and a pleasure. Lets try to keep up with the perfect score in the friendliness department by concentrating comments on why you liked an entry instead of why you didn't like the other.</p><p><br /></p><p>Remember that everyone gets 3 votes to choose which coin you think comes out on top in each of the three categories. With that I will open the thread for comments, opinions, coin pile-ons and random posting of coin things as you see fit.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Curtisimo, post: 3162864, member: 83845"]Hello everyone and welcome to Round 2 of the 2018 CoinTalk Imperator Tournament! If you are unaware of the tournament I invite you to get caught up with all the fun in the master thread; [URL='https://www.cointalk.com/threads/ancients-it%E2%80%99s-time-the-second-annual-coin-imperator-tournament-2018.320328/']https://www.cointalk.com/threads/ancients-it’s-time-the-second-annual-coin-imperator-tournament-2018.320328/[/URL] [ATTACH=full]812415[/ATTACH] A big thank you to all of our participants. Please review the below entries and cast your votes accordingly. Without further ado… [CENTER]............................................................[/CENTER] [SIZE=7][COLOR=#808080][U][B]#15 [USER=88526]@Jay GT4[/USER] [/B][/U][/COLOR][/SIZE] [ATTACH=full]812400[/ATTACH] [SIZE=3]Marcus Lepidus Imperator Laureate head of Roma (?) right M LEPIDVS Below equestrian statue of M. Aemelius Lepidus (consul 187 and 175 BC) right, carrying trophy Rome, 61 BC 3.79g Rare! Sear 371, RPC 419/1, CRR 827-828b Freed from a NGC Holder, graded strike 4/5; surface 4/5.[/SIZE] [B][U]Price:[/U][/B] $250 [B][U]Why It’s Cool:[/U][/B] [U]The History:[/U] While there are other common Republican coins struck by people named Marcus Lepidus which look similar, this one is actually quite special and rare. This coin is by the Imperator Marcus Lepidus. Marcus Lepidus struck this coin early in his career as moneyer and well before he became a member of the 2nd Triumvirate. The reverse commemorates his ancestor M. Amelius Lepidus who was consul in 187 BC and again in 175 BC. This coin was struck in 61 BC. Marcus Lepidus was married to Brutus’ sister (yes that Brutus). He was an early important supporter of Julius Caesar and later Antony. After Julius Caesar’s assassination he was instrumental in brokering the reconciliation between Antony and Octavian which led to the formalization of the 2nd triumvirate. Lepidus was named Consul and left in charge of Italy while Antony and Octavian chased after Brutus and Cassius. He was also confirmed as Pontifex Maximus (Chief Priest). In time he would be pushed aside by Antony and Octavian and only be allowed to govern North Africa. After an ill fated attempt to seize Sicily, his troops defected to Octavian and he was striped of all power and exiled to Cerceii. Despite this, he would be allowed to keep his post as Pontifex Maximus until his death. The office then became the sole procession of the Emperors. [U]The coin:[/U] I got this one on ebay from a seller who was taking offers. Originally listed at over $600 I put in a low ball offer of $250 in hopes of negotiating and was pleasantly surprised it was accepted. Coins of this type and in this condition are listed for over $900 (If you can find one for sale). Currently there is only one on Vcoins for $975 and one sold in Gemini 14 for $550 plus fees. The coin comes in 2 variations, one with the legend [B]AN•XV•PR•H•O•C•S•[/B] and like this one, without the legend but with the exergue [B]M LEPIDVS[/B] [U] The Break out:[/U] As a bonus this coin came entombed in an NGC Holder graded Strike: 4/5; Surface: 4/5. The first thing I did was to free Lepidus from his plastic prison and set him in his proper place in my Imperators coin tray beside Antony, Octavian and Caesar. [CENTER]............................................................[/CENTER] [SIZE=7][COLOR=#808080][U][B]#31 [USER=78244]@TypeCoin971793[/USER] [/B][/U][/COLOR][/SIZE] [ATTACH=full]812405[/ATTACH] [SIZE=3]Xin Dynasty, Wang Mang (10-14 AD) Obverse: 大布黃千 Da Bu Huang Qian(“Great Spade Valued 1000”) Reverse: Blank H-9.29 (normally 60 x 25 mm), FD 484/5 Weight: 13.53g Size: 53 x 23mm[/SIZE] [B][U]Price:[/U][/B] $40 [B][U]Why It’s Cool:[/U][/B] There are few rulers who are best known for their numismatic legacy, and fewer still who are also remembered for nearly destroying their civilization. Wang Mang is one of these. Wang Mang was born into one of the most powerful families in China and was related to the ruling family and the emperor himself. Despite this, Wang Mang became an introspective and thrifty Confucian scholar, abhorring the lavish and wasteful lifestyles enjoyed by the rest of his family when so much of China’s population could barely feed themselves. He would also give away much of his excess wealth, making him extremely popular among the commoners and elite alike. Wang was said to become humbler the further he was promoted to positions of power. As his power grew, so did his popularity. [ATTACH=full]812406[/ATTACH] [I][SIZE=3]Wang Mang (image from [URL='https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wang_Mang']Wikipedia[/URL]) [/SIZE][/I] Wang Mang deftly used his family connections, his popularity, and some questionable manipulation of the traditional imperial succession to take advantage of every situation and eventually forced himself to become acting emperor for a child whom he hand-picked to be emperor. With this power, he introduced fiduciary knife coins in 7 AD to confiscate all of the gold of the nobility. He used knives because they hearkened to the Zhou Dynasty, what Confucians considered to be the ideal standard for government and society. Within two years he demonetized these coins, destroying the wealth and power of the nobility overnight. With this, he took over the throne in 9 AD as emperor and established his Xin (“New”) Dynasty. Wang Mang immediately instituted many radical reforms, namely: 1. The abolition of slavery through a ruinous tax on slave owners. 2. The nationalization of land, essentially making the government own all of it. 3. Distributing the land evenly among the population, so each family would have around 5 acres. 4. Families were grouped into “chings,” which consisted of 6-8 families. This was an attempt to return to the traditional Zhou “well field” system. 5. A national bank that will offer fair interest rates to everyone in the population. 6. Government intervention in the markets to control and stabilize prices. It would buy up good when they are cheap to raise the price, and it would sell the excess during hard times to lower the price. 7. A coinage system with 15 denominations ranging from a value of 1 to 1000. The value 1, 10, 20, 30, 40, and 50 coins were in the shape of familiar cash coins. The value 100, 200, 300, ... , 1000 coins were in the shape of spades, emulating Zhou spade coinage. In addition, there were 12 other traditional denominations using the following conversions: [ATTACH=full]812408[/ATTACH] Wang Mang’s justification for these coins: “If all currency is large, when one needs a small amount it is not available. If it is small [like the Wu Zhus currently in circulation], transporting it is troublesome and expensive. If large and small exist, then their use is convenient.” This sounds a lot like the currency system in place today, showing just how far ahead of his time he was. 8. An annual income tax of 10% on money earned or crop yields per working individual. The sudden and drastic changes to a society built off maintaining tradition were met with much resentment and opposition. Some of the above reforms failed so horribly that they were rescinded in 12 AD. Wang Mang tried to force the populace to use his new coins and abandon the Wu Zhu. Given the track record with the knife coins, the populace understandably did not trust this new coinage. Wang Mang responded by making the use and possession of Wu Zhus punishable by death. Since no one wanted the new coins, trade and thus the entire economy ground to a halt. Millions starved, and many rebellions began. These were desperate times for all. (This is running long, so to catch the rest of the story of failure and degeneration, visit my thread: [url]https://www.cointalk.com/threads/gold-inlaid-knife-coin-the-fascinating-story-of-the-rise-and-fall-of-wang-mang.315047/[/url] ) So, with the ownership and use of the plentiful Western Han “Wu Zhus” punishable by death, they became great fodder for being melted down and cast into counterfeits of Wang Mang’s highly-inflated coins. Due to the amount of profit gleaned from counterfeiting these coins, counterfeiting was rampant. Wang Mang initially responded by executing anyone caught counterfeiting. As this did not have any effect, Wang ordered that the counterfeiter and his entire family would become slaves of the state. This also did not work, so the punishment was escalated to the entire “ching” of six families being held responsible for the counterfeiter, and they would all become slaves of the state even if only one member was caught. It is said that 7 of every 10 people sentenced to slavery died from the hardship. (As an aside, Wang Mang also tried to curb counterfeiting by making it illegal to own bronze or charcoal. Needless to say, this order did not last long.) So, about the coin. It is a value-1000 spade from the coinage reform of 10 AD. However, it is much smaller than normal issues, and the style is slightly different (namely the flatness of the strokes and the malformation of the rim. From this, I conclude that it is a contemporary counterfeit. This is significant and exciting because it represents the desperation China’s people felt at this time, especially given the draconian punishments should the counterfeiter be caught. Making this coin involved a sheer amount of risk. Holding this coin makes me wonder the fate of it maker: was he ever caught? How severe was his punishment? Did his family suffer? What about his neighbors? This is what makes this coin so cool. This spade type generally sells for $90-120. I was willing to spend that much or even more for this coolness factor, so I considered $40 to be an absolute bargain. Here is a picture of this coin sitting next to an official issue so you can see the differences in size and style. [ATTACH=full]812410[/ATTACH] [CENTER]............................................................[/CENTER] [B][SIZE=5][COLOR=#808080][U]A Gentle Reminder[/U][/COLOR][/SIZE][/B] Round 1 went about as well as anyone could have hoped from the perspective of keeping the commentary fun, interesting and friendly. It would be a challenge to run a tournament of this type on almost any other board but with the great people here on CT it has been both an honor and a pleasure. Lets try to keep up with the perfect score in the friendliness department by concentrating comments on why you liked an entry instead of why you didn't like the other. Remember that everyone gets 3 votes to choose which coin you think comes out on top in each of the three categories. With that I will open the thread for comments, opinions, coin pile-ons and random posting of coin things as you see fit.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
[Poll-17] #15 Jay GT4 vs #31 TypeCoin (Round 2) CIT 2018
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...