Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;GDJMSP, post: 9560, member: 112&quot;]Well - to the best of my knowledge - no this is not the case. Let me illustrate by quoting a statement made by John Feigenbaum, a member of the Board of Directors of the PNG back in April.</p><p><br /></p><p>&quot; The main reason why PNG allows sponsors (and why I think it&#039;s a good idea), is that -- like other non-profit industry orgs -- we are always running a deficit. What a boon for us that a major grading service will sponsor us which helps us create more programs and do positive things for the hobby. &quot;</p><p><br /></p><p>Mr. Feigenbaum also went on to say this - </p><p><br /></p><p>&quot; It has even been suggested by officials at PCGS that we allow multiple grading services to become sponsors in future years. I think that&#039;s a great idea, but it was never proposed until this contract was closed. &quot;</p><p><br /></p><p>I find this comment that it has never before been suggested just a bit strange. For I myself suggested it to the PNG back in 2001. But I guess my voice doesn&#039;t carry as much weight as the voice of PCGS&nbsp; <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie11" alt=":rolleyes:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" />[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in